Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2016-7255
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: ProPharma Group case:# 1-45941791
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: VIRGINIA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-83
Nom du produit: HARTZ ULTRAGUARD FLEA & TICK COLLAR FOR CATS AND KITTENS - PURPLE SAFE
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-147
Nom du produit: HARTZ ULTRA ONESPOT GUARD FLEA EGG & FLEA LARVAE TREATMENT FOR CATS
Liquide
Autre (préciser)
collarOui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Domestic Shorthair
1
Homme
5.5
5
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Oui
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-45982122 - The reporter, a pet owner, indicated his cat was exposed to an insecticidal collar containing the active ingredient tetrachlorvinphos, and an insecticidal spot-on containing the active ingredient (S)-methoprene. Approximately one month before the day of initial contact with the registrant, the reporter applied the spot-on product to his 5-pound, 5.5-year-old, male domestic shorthair cat. Two days before the day of initial contact, the reporter applied the collar to the cat. Soon after the collar was applied, the cat became lethargic, stopped eating, and lost weight. The reporter was advised to get veterinary care for the pet and that this would be an unexpected reaction to the products. Four days after the day of initial contact, the reporter called to state the cat had started vocalizing and has not urinated or defecated in four days. He had not gotten veterinary care for the pet due to financial concerns. The reporter was advised to get immediate veterinary attention for the cat as the symptoms sounded very serious. A follow-up call was made eight days after the day of initial contact and the voice mail was full so a message was unable to be left. Another follow-up call was made nine days after initial contact and a voice mail was left for an update on the cat. The reporter called back that same day and indicated he had sought emergency veterinary care for the cat on the day he had last spoken to the registrant. The cats facial skin was irritated from flea bites, he was weak, and anemic. The cat was bathed and given a pill to get rid of the fleas, but the reporter did not know what other treatments were done to the cat. The reporter took the cat home after 2-3 hours at the emergency vet. The cat had a seizure and died five days after the day of initial contact with the registrant. The reporter brought the deceased cat to another veterinarian where a necropsy was performed. No necropsy results have been reported. No additional information is available.
Mort