Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2016-3093
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 1794142
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Adresse: 8810 Tenth Ave North
Ville: Minneapolis
État: MN
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 55427-4319
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: WEST VIRGINIA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 1021-1674-8845
Nom du produit: Hot Shot Bedbug & Flea Fogger
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Other / Autre
Specify Type: Residential apartments, in apartment unit below caller.
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Unknown
1
Homme
2
84.00
lbs
Respiratoire
<=15 min / <=15 min
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Oui
Non
Inconnu
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Smelling fumes from product used in apartment below
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
5/19/2016 A report dated 3/30/2016 was forwarded for documentation. The report states that caller's neighbor fogged in the apartment underneath them 5 months ago. An unspecified period of time later, her dog began sneezing and wouldn't eat. Caller took dog to the vet where he was given unknown intravenous medications and recovered. It is not known what the dog's diagnosis was. The neighbor reportedly fogged again on an unspecified date in November 2015, and 4 days later the dog had pus coming out of his eyes and nose, his head became "sunk in," and then he died.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the insidious development of the complications reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is extremely vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact with this product occurred, such illness would be unexpected and is not consistent with the toxicological profile of this product..