Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2016-0120
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 150142422
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Wellmark International
Adresse: 100 Stone Road West, Suite 111
Ville: Guelph
État: Ontario
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N1G5L3
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: QUEBEC
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation 28382 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Zodiac Dual Action Flea And Tick Spray For Cats And Kittens
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Inconnu
Autre
Cat / Chat
Domestic Longhair
1
Inconnu
10.0
10.0
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
Between August 15, 2015 and August 19, 2015 the cat developed lethargy and anorexia. On August 16, 2015 the cat developed agitation, hyperactivity, and adipsia. On August 19, 2015 the cat died. On October 15, 2015 a pet store employee contacted the Animal Product Safety Service (APSS) as the owner is blaming the product for the cat's death and requested a refund which was granted. The pet store employee stated that the owner buried the cat in the yard and was never seen by a veterinarian. The APSS veterinarian stated if animals are heavily saturated, there can be risks for central nervous system (CNS) depression and ataxia. The APSS veterinarian also stated if ingested, there can be signs of hypersalivation and nausea. The APSS veterinarian further stated some animals may have mild dermal hyperesthesia from the active ingredients, or agitation as the fleas are dying. The APSS veterinarian finally stated she would not expect risks for death from this product. The APSS veterinarian recommended obtaining additional information (signalment of the cat, signs seen, previous health history, etc). A necropsy was not available.
Mort
The APSS veterinarian stated that the substance was not considered to be related to causing the clinical situation. On November 9, 2015 the pet store employee called the APSS back as the owner wanted a refund from the manufacturer. The APSS assistant recommended referral to the manufacturer (to discuss reimbursement) and calling back with questions (if owner had direct questions).