Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2014-5745
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 1441149
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Adresse: 8810 Tenth Ave North
Ville: Minneapolis
État: MN
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 55427-4319
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: TEXAS
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 1021-1866-53853
Nom du produit: Black Flag Fogging Insecticide Formula 2
Autre (préciser)
AerosolOui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
DSH
1
Homme
4
8.00
lbs
Inconnu
<=15 min / <=15 min
<=30 min / <=30 min
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Inconnu
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
8/10/2014 Caller states that he was fogging his backyard about 2 hours ago, and saw his cat come around the corner of the area where the fogging was taking place. Caller immediately took the cat inside, and no direct exposure was witnessed. As he put the cat in the house and out of the area that he was treating, he noticed that the cat seemed extremely frightened. When he went back in the house after spraying, he found the cat deceased on the floor. The cat was never evaluated by a DVM for necropsy to determine cause of death.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the resultant feline fatality reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks biological plausibility. The product use history lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact with this pesticide occurred, a fatal outcome as reported in this cat is unexpected. Even if true pyrethroid toxicity were to occur in this case it would manifest with acute neurological complications, primarily in the form of tremors, seizures and ataxia which were not reported in this incident. Finally, a necropsy was not performed on the expired animal in order to determine a cause of death.