Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2014-0654
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 1-35116213
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Scotts Canada Ltd.
Adresse: 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 5, Suite 101
Ville: Mississauga
État: Ontario
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: L5N2R7
Incident chez l'humain
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: ONTARIO
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation 29695 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Ecosense Weed B Gon RTU Weed Control
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Inconnu
Autre
Sexe: Homme
Âge: >1 <=6 yrs / > 1 < = 6 ans
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Oui
Non
Non professionnel
Contact avec la zone traitée
Quelle était l'activité? Playing on the lawn
Inconnu
Peau
Unknown / Inconnu
<=30 min / <=30 min
1-35116213 - The reporter indicated that both his cat and his grandson were exposed to an herbicide containing the active ingredient iron HEDTA. The reporter applied the product to his lawn one week prior to initial contact with the registrant. One day after the product was applied the reporters (age) year old, 7 pound cat had access to the application site and the reporter indicated that his cat often eats grass and likely ate grass from the application site. About six days after product application the cat was brought to the veterinarian for inappetance, dehydration and lethargy. The veterinarian ran blood work and per the reporter the cat had liver and kidney issues. One week after product application the reporters (age) year old grandson was playing on the lawn and developed hives. The child was taken to the hospital where the hives were treated and at the time of the call the grandsons symptoms had resolved. Prior to this event the child had no known allergies. The reporter was advised that there are numerous possible causes for allergic reactions and symptoms one week after product application would not be expected. Working with a doctor was recommended to help determine an underlying cause for his grandsons allergic reaction. The reporter was further advised that regarding his cats small ingestion of the product it would only be expected to cause transient stomach irritation. With large ingestions it is possible to see more severe symptoms but exposure through ingestion of grass in the application area would only be expected to cause minor stomach irritation. Continued veterinary care was recommended for any ongoing symptoms. On follow-up call, one day later, the reporter indicated that his cat was still very ill and will be taken back to the veterinarian tomorrow. No further information is available.
Mineure
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Unknown
1
Homme
12
7
lbs
Orale
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Oui
Inconnu
Unknown/Inconnu
Contact treat.area/Contact surf. traitée
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-35116213 - The reporter indicated that both his cat and his grandson were exposed to an herbicide containing the active ingredient iron HEDTA. The reporter applied the product to his lawn one week prior to initial contact with the registrant. One day after the product was applied the reporters (age) year old, 7 pound cat had access to the application site and the reporter indicated that his cat often eats grass and likely ate grass from the application site. About six days after product application the cat was brought to the veterinarian for inappetance, dehydration and lethargy. The veterinarian ran blood work and per the reporter the cat had liver and kidney issues. One week after product application the reporters (age) year old grandson was playing on the lawn and developed hives. The child was taken to the hospital where the hives were treated and at the time of the call the grandsons symptoms had resolved. Prior to this event the child had no known allergies. The reporter was advised that there are numerous possible causes for allergic reactions and symptoms one week after product application would not be expected. Working with a doctor was recommended to help determine an underlying cause for his grandsons allergic reaction. The reporter was further advised that regarding his cats small ingestion of the product it would only be expected to cause transient stomach irritation. With large ingestions it is possible to see more severe symptoms but exposure through ingestion of grass in the application area would only be expected to cause minor stomach irritation. Continued veterinary care was recommended for any ongoing symptoms. On follow-up call, one day later, the reporter indicated that his cat was still very ill and will be taken back to the veterinarian tomorrow. No further information is available.
Modérée