Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2013-2368
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 130026279
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Farnam Companies, Inc.
Adresse: 301 W. Osborn Road
Ville: Phoenix
État: Arizona
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 85013
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: MISSISSIPPI
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 270-343
Nom du produit: Adams Flea And Tick Mist Insecticide Repellent And Deodorant For Dogs
Liquide
Non
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Labrador Retriever
1
Femme
4.0
80.0
lbs
Orale
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Accidental ingestion/Ingestion accident.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
Between February 25 and February 27, 2013 the owner noticed that the dog was eating grass. In addition, the owner noticed that there was a Adams Flea and Tick Mist Insecticide Repellent and Deodorant bottle chewed and punctured in the yard. On the morning of March 1, 2013 the owner noticed that the dog's back was arched significantly and the dog was sucking in her stomach significantly; the owner also noticed that the dog was drooling. Several hours later that morning, the owner discovered that the dog had died while unattended. Later that day, the owner contacted the Animal Product Safety Service (APSS) to obtain help. The APSS veterinarian stated that the product is a low concentration pyrethroid and that ingestion of the contents of the bottle would be expected to cause mild to marked drooling due to the bad taste; this would develop almost immediately and should resolve shortly. The APSS veterinarian also stated that this was not a serious exposure, even if a couple of ounces were licked up. The APSS veterinarian recommended that the owner have a necropsy performed to determine the cause of the dog's death and that the owner's veterinarian call for information if a necropsy were being pursued.
Mort
The APSS veterinarian stated that the substance was not considered to be related to causing the clinical situation. On the evening of March 1, 2013 an APSS technician called the owner to discuss a necropsy. The owner stated that the dog's body had been disposed of and was not available for necropsy.
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Shetland Sheepdog Mix
1
Femme
16.0
15.0
lbs
Orale
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Accidental ingestion/Ingestion accident.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
Between February 25 and February 27, 2013 the owner noticed that the dog was eating grass. In addition, the owner noticed that there was a Adams Flea and Tick Mist Insecticide Repellent and Deodorant bottle chewed and punctured in the yard. On the morning of February 28, 2013 the owner noticed that the dog's back was arched significantly and the dog was sucking in her stomach significantly; the owner also noticed that the dog was drooling. Several hours later that morning, the owner discovered that the dog had died while unattended. On March 1, 2013 the owner contacted the Animal Product Safety Service (APSS) to obtain help. The APSS veterinarian stated that the product is a low concentration pyrethroid and that ingestion of the contents of the bottle would be expected to cause mild to marked drooling due to the bad taste; this would develop almost immediately and should resolve shortly. The APSS veterinarian also stated that this was not a serious exposure, even if a couple of ounces were licked up. The APSS veterinarian recommended that the owner have a necropsy performed to determine the cause of the dog's death and that the owner's veterinarian call for information if a necropsy were being pursued.
Mort
The APSS veterinarian stated that the substance was not considered to be related to causing the clinical situation. On the evening of March 1, 2013 an APSS technician called the owner to discuss a necropsy. The owner stated that the dog's body had been disposed of and was not available for necropsy.