Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2013-1041
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 1050551
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Adresse: 8810 Tenth Ave North
Ville: Minneapolis
État: MN
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 55427-4319
Incident chez l'humain
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: KANSAS
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 1021-1603
Nom du produit: NyGuard IGR
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. Inconnu
Nom du produit: Bayer CropScience Suspend SC
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Autre
Sexe: Inconnu
Âge: Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Oui
Non
Non professionnel
Aucun
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
10/1/2012 Caller is a professional pest control operator. They had applied NyGuard IGR as well as a Bayer CropScience product called Suspend SC as a crack and crevice application within a customer's home on 2/25/2012. The customer was not in the home during the application. Customer did not return to the home until 3 hours after the application. An unspecified period of time after the application, the customer birthed a premature baby. The caller did not have specific information on how premature the baby was or what the state of the babies health was. The date of birth is not known. The customer is now alleging that the premature birth occurred as a result of the pesticide application.
Majeure
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of these pesticides in a person's home and the occurrence of a premature birth is inconceivable and lacks biological plausibility as these active ingredients are not known teratogens at the concentrations used with applications. Secondly, the product use history lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to these pesticide products. Even had casual or incidental contact with a surface exposed to these pesticides occurred, such a serious complication would be unexpected. When considering the body of regulatory data and post-marketing data as well as the weight of scientific peer reviewed evidence on the active ingredients used in this product such a causal relationship appears to be scientifically implausible.