Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2013-0130
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 120128387
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Wellmark International
Adresse: 100 Stone Road West, Suite 111
Ville: Guelph
État: Ontario
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N1G5L3
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: ONTARIO
ARLA No d'homologation 19209 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Zodiac Flea and Tick Shampoo
ARLA No d'homologation 21744 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Zodiac Fleatrol Flea and Tick Spray For Dogs and Cats
ARLA No d'homologation 28743 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Zodiac Spot On II Flea Control For Cats And Kittens
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Domestic Mediumhair
1
Homme
2.0
8.0
lbs
Cutanée
Orale
Unknown / Inconnu
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Not recovered / Non rétabli
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
On September 12, 2012 the owner noticed that the cat was symptomatic. Later that day, the owner contacted the Animal Product Safety Service (APSS) to obtain help. The APSS veterinarian stated that with the flea and tick spray product, dermal irritation was possible and if some were ingested, mild gastrointestinal (GI) upset and hypersalivation were possible. The APSS veterinarian also stated that paresthesia was also possible, and that central nervous system (CNS) depression was possible if the cat was saturated and the product was alcohol based. Regarding the spot on product, the APSS veterinarian said that dermal irritation was possible and that if the product were ingested, mild GI upset and hypersalivation would be possible. For both of the products, the APSS veterinarian said that signs would have been expected to have begun closer to the exposure time. The APSS veterinarian stated that the flea and tick spay product could cause dermal irritation and that, if ingested, mild GI signs are possible. The APSS veterinarian also said that paresthesia was possible, but unlikely with a shampoo and low concentration pyrethrins. The APSS assistant recommended that the owner monitor the cat's mucous membrane color, which she did during the consultation. The owner observed that the cat's mucous membranes were pale. The APSS assistant also recommended that the owner rinse the cat's coat and skin with water and consult with a veterinarian about flea prevention. The call was disconnected before the APSS assistant could recommend that the owner take the cat to the veterinarian for evaluation and to determine if the cat was anemic.
Modérée
The APSS veterinarian stated that the flea and tick shampoo product, the flea and tick spray product, and the spot on product were considered to have a doubtful likelihood of causing the clinical situation. The APSS veterinarian stated that a flea infestation was considered to have a medium likelihood of causing the clinical situation. On September 14, 2012 an APSS assistant contacted the owner to update the case. The owner stated that the cat remained symptomatic and was still suffering from a flea infestation.