Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2012-4647
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case#: 1-31640066
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: ONTARIO
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation 29283 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: UltraGuard Pro Flea/Tick Drops for Dogs/Puppies under 30 lbs
ARLA No d'homologation 25654 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: UltraGuard Flea/Tick Spray for Dogs (Canada)
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Non
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Mixed Breed
1
Homme
7
14
lbs
Cutanée
>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Non
Non
Not recovered / Non rétabli
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-31640066- The reporter, a veterinarian, indicated that a dog was exposed to an insecticidal spray containing the active ingredient Tetrachlorvinphos, another insecticidal spot-on product containing the active ingredients permethrin and methoprene and a third non-registrant insecticidal shampoo with unknown active ingredients. The pet owner applied the spot-on product to her 7-year-old, male, 14 pound, mixed breed dog three weeks prior to initial contact with the registrant. After applying the spot-on product the pet owner bathed the dog with a non-registrant flea and tick shampoo and then applied a registrant insecticidal spray to the dog. Shortly after the products were applied the dog developed symptoms which have persisted until the time of initial contact. The pet owner did not seek veterinary assistant until the time of initial contact due to a lack of resources. At the time of initial contact, the reporter indicated that the dog was weak in the rear legs, lethargic and had black tarry diarrhea. The reporter was advised that neurologic symptoms with exposure to the AI would be generalized not localized as is reported in this dog. The reporter was further advised that melena is inconsistent with exposure to the registrant products. Decontamination and further diagnostics were recommended to identify a cause for the dogs symptoms. On follow-up call, one day later, a veterinarian at the clinic indicated that the dog was still suffering from hind limb ataxia and they suspected it had a spinal issue; not a toxicity. No further information is available.
Modérée