Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2012-2794
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 977328
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: TEXAS
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 4822-278
Nom du produit: Raid Fumigator Fumigating Fogger 3 pack 0.35oz
Autre (préciser)
Granular formulation for fumigation upon adding water.Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Bulldog
1
Femme
12
50.00
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
5/21/2012 Caller used product in the home on May 7 2012. Family and dog remained out of the house for over 5 hours during the fumigation, and all returned together to open windows and ventilate. Beginning on May 20, the dog started developing trouble walking. Dog was examined by veterinarian, and no neurological signs were noted. 5/30/2012 Caller reports that the dog has now passed away. The dog had cardiac arrest and died on May 22. Neither the consumer nor the veterinarian think that the product had anything to do with dog's death. No necropsy was performed. Cause of death remains unknown.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the delayed development of the complications reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks biological plausibility. Secondly, this case lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact with a surface exposed to this pesticide occurred, such serious illness as reported in this dog is unexpected.