Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2012-2035
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case #: 1-29963296
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Syngenta Canada Inc.
Adresse: 140 Research Lane, Research Park
Ville: Guelph
État: Ontario
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N1G4Z3
Incident chez l'humain
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: MINNESOTA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 100-1075
Nom du produit: Force 3G Insecticide
Liquide
Non
Inconnu
Professionnel de la santé
Sexe: Homme
Âge: >64 yrs / > 64 ans
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Oui
Non
Professionnel
Dérive du pesticide à partir de la zone traitée
Inconnu
Respiratoire
Unknown / Inconnu
>30 min <=2 hrs / >30 min <=2 h
1-29963296- The reporter, a physician, reports a patient had presented to her following exposure to a pesticide containing the active ingredient Tefluthrin. The reporter indicated the [age] year old male (Subform II, #1) worked in a facility where the product was handled. Two days prior to presentation application equipment was being cleaned while the patient was in the general vicinity. Within several hours the patient experienced pressure in his chest, his tongue and roof of mouth were numb, he had shortness of breath, and he had a burning sensational in his nasal passages. The symptoms had resolved within 1.5 hours but he had some lingering malaise described as feeling achy and tired since the occurrence. The patients wife (Subform II, #2) was in the area when the initial exposure took place and developed a transitory burning sensation in her nasal passages that quickly resolved. The caller was advised the ongoing nature and severity of the symptoms seen were inconsistent with the expectations of the active ingredient and the finished product. She was also provided product literature to help guide her evaluation. On follow up the caller indicated laboratory tests had revealed the patient had a myocardial infarction (heart attack). She stated he was not admitted as the event was mild and was for the most part resolved at the point she had seen him. The patient was now under the care of a cardiologist on an outpatient basis. The physician commented the patient had a history of coronary artery bypass, hypertension and high blood pressure. She provided her opinion that the initial symptoms of respiratory irritation may have been consistent with exposure to the product, but that latter symptoms were more consistent with the heart attack and unrelated to the pesticide exposure. No further information is available.
Majeure
Professionnel de la santé
Sexe: Femme
Âge: >64 yrs / > 64 ans
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Non
Non
Professionnel
Dérive du pesticide à partir de la zone traitée
Inconnu
Respiratoire
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
1-29963296- The reporter, a physician, reports a patient had presented to her following exposure to a pesticide containing the active ingredient Tefluthrin. The reporter indicated the [age] year old male (Subform II, #1) worked in a facility where the product was handled. Two days prior to presentation application equipment was being cleaned while the patient was in the general vicinity. Within several hours the patient experienced pressure in his chest, his tongue and roof of mouth were numb, he had shortness of breath, and he had a burning sensational in his nasal passages. The symptoms had resolved within 1.5 hours but he had some lingering malaise described as feeling achy and tired since the occurrence. The patients wife (Subform II, #2) was in the area when the initial exposure took place and developed a transitory burning sensation in her nasal passages that quickly resolved. The caller was advised the ongoing nature and severity of the symptoms seen were inconsistent with the expectations of the active ingredient and the finished product. She was also provided product literature to help guide her evaluation. On follow up the caller indicated laboratory tests had revealed the patient had a myocardial infarction (heart attack). She stated he was not admitted as the event was mild and was for the most part resolved at the point she had seen him. The patient was now under the care of a cardiologist on an outpatient basis. The physician commented the patient had a history of coronary artery bypass, hypertension and high blood pressure. She provided her opinion that the initial symptoms of respiratory irritation may have been consistent with exposure to the product, but that latter symptoms were more consistent with the heart attack and unrelated to the pesticide exposure. No further information is available.
Mineure