Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2012-1434
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case#:1-29083701
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: SOUTH CAROLINA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-22
Nom du produit: UltraGuard Rid Flea Tick Shampoo for Dogs Clean Fresh Scent
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-79
Nom du produit: UltraGuard Flea Tick Powder for Dogs
Liquide
Poudre
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Non
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Pit Bull Terrier
1
Homme
4
65
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-29083701- The reporter, a pet owner, indicated her animal had been exposed to two registrant supported insecticidal products. The first is a pet flea and tick shampoo containing the active ingredients pyrethrins, piperonyl butoxide and n-octyl bicycloheptene the second is a flea and tick powder containing the active ingredient tetrachlorvinphos. The pet owner stated she bathed her four year male sixty five pound Pit Bull terrier with the shampoo and then immediately applied the powder to the animal. The pet owner stated the products were applied the night prior to her initial report. She had just returned home to find the animal dead. She stated there was evidence of vomiting prior to the animals death in the area. She reported the animal had been losing weight and hair in the recent past but was unsure what was the cause of these signs. The pet owner was advised the signs and outcome seen would be unexpected despite the fact that the products are not labeled for simultaneous usage. It was suggested that something else may have been affecting her pets heath. The pet owner was advised of registrant supported necropsy to assist in determining the cause of the animals death. At the point of this report she had not availed herself of this program. No further information is available.
Mort