Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2012-0894
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 877577
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Adresse: 8810 Tenth Ave North
Ville: Minneapolis
État: MN
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 55427-4319
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: ARIZONA
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 1021-1855-79529
Nom du produit: BLACK FLAG One Shot Ant & Roach Killer
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Chihuahua
1
Femme
7
5.00
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser No definable point of exposure with the pesticide occurred.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
10/31/2011 Caller applied the product to an area outside around the front steps 3 days ago. Several hours later, the dog was allowed free access to the area where product had been applied. The dog was never actually seen directly on the area or sniffing around the area. On the following day, the dog developed clear vomiting, foaming at the mouth, and died the same day. The dog has since been buried. The dog was never evaluated by a veterinarian.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the development of the complications reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is extremely vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact with a surface treated with this pesticide occurred, such serious illness as reported in this dog is unexpected. Even if true pyrethroid toxicity were to occur in this case it would manifest with acute neurological complications, primarily in the form of tremors and ataxia which were not reported in this incident. Furthermore, this animal was never properly evaluated and treated by a veterinarian, nor had it received proper preventive care in the form of vaccines and anti-parasite treatment prior to the occurrence of this incident.