Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2011-5675
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 868114
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Adresse: 8810 Tenth Ave North
Ville: Minneapolis
État: MN
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 55427-4319
Incident chez l'humain
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: MARYLAND
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 1021-1674-8845
Nom du produit: Hot Shot Bedbug + Flea Fogger
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Non
Personne affectée
Sexe: Femme
Âge: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Non
Non
Non professionnel
Application
Aucun
Respiratoire
<=15 min / <=15 min
Unknown / Inconnu
10/13/2011 This report is based on a vague history collected by a subregistrant of an MGK pesticide registered with the EPA. In the report the subject reports that a pesticide fogger had been used in a downstairs apartment at an unspecified period of time prior to her and her grandmother's development of illness. The only time frame mentioned in the subregistrant report was possibly 23 weeks prior to 10/13/2011. The subject reports developing sneezing and coughing on 10/6/2011. The subject also reports that her grandmother developed nausea and chest pain on 10/6/2011. The grandmother was described as experiencing a "heart attack". It is unclear if the grandmother was hospitalized but it was reported that she was receiving unspecified medications and she was under a doctor's care.
Mineure
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Given that the product use history is extremely vague and appears to have been used in a separate residence of an apartment building, the possibility of significant exposure to the pesticide appears to be negligible. Furthermore, this pyrethroid based pesticide has no inherent cardiotoxicity and would not be directly responsible for chronic heart disease culminating in a "heart attack", which by definition typically means a myocardial infarction. The direct causal link between myocardial infarction that was somehow temporally associated with the use of this pyrethroid-based pesticide is biologically implausible.
Personne affectée
Sexe: Femme
Âge: Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Oui
Inconnu
Non professionnel
Autre
Aucun
Respiratoire
<=15 min / <=15 min
>3 days <=1 wk / >3 jours <=1 sem
10/13/2011 This report is based on a vague history collected by a subregistrant of an MGK pesticide registered with the EPA. In the report the subject reports that a pesticide fogger had been used in a downstairs apartment at an unspecified period of time prior to her and her grandmother's development of illness. The only time frame mentioned in the subregistrant report was possibly 23 weeks prior to 10/13/2011. The subject reports developing sneezing and coughing on 10/6/2011. The subject also reports that her grandmother developed nausea and chest pain on 10/6/2011. The grandmother was described as experiencing a "heart attack". It is unclear if the grandmother was hospitalized but it was reported that she was receiving unspecified medications and she was under a doctor's care.
Majeure
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Given that the product use history is extremely vague and appears to have been used in a separate residence of an apartment building, the possibility of significant exposure to the pesticide appears to be negligible. Furthermore, this pyrethroid based pesticide has no inherent cardiotoxicity and would not be directly responsible for chronic heart disease culminating in a "heart attack", which by definition typically means a myocardial infarction. The direct causal link between myocardial infarction that was somehow temporally associated with the use of this pyrethroid-based pesticide is biologically implausible.