Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2011-3831
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 805648
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: ALABAMA
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 4822-473
Nom du produit: Raid Ant Killer 16 -17.5 oz
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
DLH
1
Femme
10
10.00
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
6/17/2011 Caller's spouse previously sprayed product around the kitchen sink and onto some dishes in the sink. Today caller's cat has vomited twice, and has lethargy and malaise. The cat has had no witnessed exposure to the product. The owner speculates that the cat may have jumped up on the counter and licked the dishes. 6/20/2011 Callback to the original caller for follow up information. The cat continued to have symptoms, and died last night. Owner was giving the cat Gatorade through a dropper. The cat was not evaluated by a veterinarian due to financial reasons. The cat had also been eating dog food for a week or two prior to developing symptoms. This cat also has not receive prior vaccinations or preventive medicine for parasites.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the delayed development of the complications reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is extremely vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact with this product occurred, such serious illness as reported in this cat is unexpected. Even if true pyrethroid toxicity were to occur in this case it would manifest with acute neurological complications, primarily in the form of tremors, seizures and ataxia which were not reported in this incident. Furthermore, this animal was never properly evaluated and treated by a veterinarian, nor had it received proper preventive care in the form of vaccines and anti-parasite treatment prior to the occurrence of this incident. Finally, a necropsy was not performed on the expired animal in order to determine a cause of death.