Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2011-3092
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 804311
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez l'humain
Pays: CANADA
État: ONTARIO
ARLA No d'homologation 24723 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: OFF! Deep Woods Insect Repellent 3 Aerosol 230g - Canada
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Personal use / Usage personnel
Personne affectée
Sexe: Femme
Âge: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
Système
>3 days <=1 wk / >3 jours <=1 sem
Oui
Non
Non professionnel
Application
Aucun
Respiratoire
>15 min <=2 hrs / >15 min <=2 h
<=30 min / <=30 min
Caller reports that on June 11, she developed sneezing which progressed to shortness of breath within 30 minutes of her application of the OFF! repellent to her face, arms and legs. Given the persistence of her breathing trouble, she eventually went to a local ER on June 13 where she was started on oral prednisone and a bronchodilator inhaler before being sent home. She was not admitted. She was noticeably better by the time she reported the incident on June 15. She has no prior history of asthma or respiratory problems. Follow-up with the consumer was completed on July 12. She states she developed shortness of breath again when she used the product again on July 7. She treated herself again with the leftover medications she had from her original illness in June. Her symptoms readily resolved within 3-4 days and she did not see a doctor. At this time she also reported that her father developed respiratory irritation within an hour of applying the product to his arms and legs the weekend of July 9. He bathed the following day and recovered without an specific treatments. He did not see a doctor.
Modérée
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. The differential diagnosis for an acute respiratory condition of this nature would include multiple potential etiologies which, in addition to this product, include multiple environmental factors. The routine application of this insect repellent is not typically associated with the sudden acute onset of upper respiratory symptoms.
Personne affectée
Sexe: Homme
Âge: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
Système
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
Non
Non
Non professionnel
Application
Aucun
Peau
<=15 min / <=15 min
<=30 min / <=30 min
Caller reports that on June 11, she developed sneezing which progressed to shortness of breath within 30 minutes of her application of the OFF! repellent to her face, arms and legs. Given the persistence of her breathing trouble, she eventually went to a local ER on June 13 where she was started on oral prednisone and a bronchodilator inhaler before being sent home. She was not admitted. She was noticeably better by the time she reported the incident on June 15. She has no prior history of asthma or respiratory problems. Follow-up with the consumer was completed on July 12. She states she developed shortness of breath again when she used the product again on July 7. She treated herself again with the leftover medications she had from her original illness in June. Her symptoms readily resolved within 3-4 days and she did not see a doctor. At this time she also reported that her father developed respiratory irritation within an hour of applying the product to his arms and legs the weekend of July 9. He bathed the following day and recovered without an specific treatments. He did not see a doctor.
Mineure
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. The differential diagnosis for an acute respiratory condition of this nature would include multiple potential etiologies which, in addition to this product, include multiple environmental factors. The routine application of this insect repellent is not typically associated with the sudden acute onset of upper respiratory symptoms.