Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2011-2243
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case # 1-25996404
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: BRITISH COLUMBIA
ARLA No d'homologation 26491 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: UltraGuard One Spot Treatment for Cats Kittens
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Non
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Domestic shorthair
1
Inconnu
13
6
lbs
Cutanée
Orale
Unknown / Inconnu
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Fully Recovered / Complètement rétabli
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-25996404- The reporter, a pet owner, indicates his animal was exposed to an insecticidal product containing the active ingredient methoprene. The pet owner indicated he applied the product to his thirteen year six pound domestic shorthair cat four days prior to his initial contact with the registrant. The pet was reported to have developed lethargy the following day. The animal was bathed to remove the product two days after application when the signs did not resolve. Three days after application the animal was taken to the veterinarian. The animal was reported to have had a white blood cell count at the veterinarian¿s office; the owner stated the vet had indicated a sign of an unidentified nidus of infection. The animal was reportedly being treated by the veterinarian but the pet owner was unable to describe the treatments. The pet owner was advised that the signs seen would not be expected despite the fact that this product is not labeled for animal above ten years of age. The observed elevated white blood cell count is inconsistent with the toxicity profile of the active ingredient. The pet owner spontaneously called back five days following his initial report. He indicated his animal was improved but did not provide further treatments or diagnostics done by the veterinarian. No further information is available.
Modérée