Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2011-2228
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case : 1-26082055
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Syngenta Crop Protection Canada, Inc.
Adresse: 140 Research Lane, Research Park
Ville: Guelph
État: Ontario
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N1G4Z3
Incident chez l'humain
Pays: CANADA
État: ALBERTA
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation 29192 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Cruiser Maxx Cereals
ARLA No d'homologation 27577 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Apron Maxx RTA Fungicide Seed Treatment
Inconnu
Inconnu
Personne affectée
Sexe: Homme
Âge: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Oui
Inconnu
Inconnu
Gants résistants aux produits chimiques
Respiratoire
Unknown / Inconnu
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
1-26082055- The reporter indicated her son may have been exposed to two pesticides. The first contained the active ingredients difenoconazole, mefenoxam, and thiamethoxam. The second contained fludioxonil and mefenoxam. The caller indicated her (age) old son worked with the former product three or four days prior to her initial contact with the registrant. He was reported to have worked with the latter two days prior to her contact with the registrant. The caller did not clarify in what capacity her son worked with the two products. The caller did not describe a discreet exposure incident. She indicated when he got out of the truck he felt achy, had a headache and back ache. She reports he also described chills and was shaking. She indicated his eyes were glassy and he was listless. She did not clarify when he experienced these symptoms with respect to working with the products or with respect to her initial call to the registrant. She reported her son had gloves (non specific) and boots on but did not have a mask. She reports he may have been exposed to the product (unknown which) for 1-2 hours. The caller indicates she believed the symptoms were related to exposure due to the fact that he had a similar experience the year prior when applying the same products. The caller added at the end of her call her son was currently coughing up bloody mucus and his tonsils were inflamed. The caller was advised the symptoms described were inconsistent with the toxicity profile of the active ingredients described, the time line described and the avenue described. She was advised to heave her son seek medical care and to consider other causes for his symptoms. On follow up the caller indicated her son was seen by a doctor and no diagnosis was reached. He was placed on an oral antibiotic for his symptoms, no diagnostics were indicated. The caller was advised despite the apparent unrelatedness of the symptoms to the products used her son should use appropriate personal protective equipment when working with this and all pesticides. She was supplied with a MSDS to describe appropriate PPE used in an occupational setting when working with the described products. No further information is available.
Modérée