Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2011-1182
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 731979
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: NORTH CAROLINA
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 4822-513
Nom du produit: Raid Flying Insect Killer Formula 6 Indoor/Outdoor 15oz
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Mixed Breed
1
Femme
2
10.00
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
12/17/2010 Caller reports spraying the product in her bathroom last night. She does not know if her cat ever entered this bathroom. This morning, her cat was showing difficulty walking. No tremors reported. 1/5/2011 Callback attempted to the original caller. A message was left requesting follow up information. 1/6/2011 Callback to the original caller for follow up information. Caller reports that the symptoms progressed to where the cat could no longer stand up, and the cat died later that night. The cat was not taken to a veterinarian and no treatments were performed at home. No necropsy was performed.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. The product use history is vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact to a surface exposed to this ready-to-use pesticide product occurred, such serious illness resulting in fatality would be unexpected. Finally, this animal was never properly evaluated and treated by a DVM nor was a necropsy performed to determine a possible cause of death.