Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2010-5871
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 677576
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: INDIANA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 4822-273
Nom du produit: Raid Flea Killer Plus Carpet and Room Spray 16 oz
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. Inconnu
Nom du produit: TAT Fogger
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Domestic shorthair
2
Femme
0.08
Inconnu
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Contact treat.area/Contact surf. traitée
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
8/13/2010 Caller used fogger with brand name TAT on 8/4/2020. The label information for this fogger is not available. The owner then used the Raid product on 8/12/2010. Today they have found that 2 of 7 week old kittens had died of unknown causes. No symptoms were noted prior to the kittens being found dead. The owner is unable to describe how the kittens would have been exposed to the product other than to have walked on treated surfaces. None of the kittens had been evaluated by a veterinarian nor have any of the kittens received an preventative care like vaccinations.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the delayed development of the complications reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks and biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is extremely vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact with this product occurred, such illness reported in just 2 out 7 kittens in the home would be unexpected. Even if true pyrethroid toxicity were to occur in this case it would manifest with acute neurological complications, primarily in the form of tremors and ataxia which were never reported in this case. Finally, these cats were never properly evaluated and treated by a DVM nor was a necropsy performed to determine a possible cause of death.