Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2010-5500
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case # 1-24243887
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: NORTH CAROLINA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-147
Nom du produit: UltraGuard One Spot Flea Egg Larvae Treatment for Cats Kittens
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Non
Professionnel de la santé
Cat / Chat
unknown
1
Inconnu
0.11
0.94
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
Système
Persisted until death
Oui
Inconnu
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-24243887- The caller, a veterinarian, reports a patient of his was exposed to an insecticide containing the active ingredient methoprene. The caller reports the owners of a six week 0.94 pound kitten placed the product, a topical flea and tick drop, on the animal the day prior to his initial contact with the registrant. The animal had presented to him the day of the initial contact with the registrant with the complaint of seizures that had been noted the night prior initially. He indicates the owner had stated the animal had four discreet seizures the night prior and one the day of its initial presentation. The caller was advised the product was labeled for use in animals 12 weeks and older, but despite the misuse signs as described would not be expected. The caller was advised of the low order of toxicity and low concentration of the active ingredient in this product. He was advised of registrant supported hair testing that might be done to determine if the active ingredient involved was accurately represented. It was recommended the animal be washed in a non insecticidal, symptoms treated as they arise, and additional etiologies be ruled out. The reporter was contacted two more times to conduct follow up. The registrant was advised the animal was washed numerous times. The animal continued to have intermittent discreet seizures. The only diagnostic allowed by the owner due to cost was to determine blood glucose (which was not reported to be abnormal). The owner would not allow further diagnostics or therapeutics due to cost. The reporter called back spontaneously one week after his initial contact with the registrant to indicate the animal had died at home following a seizure. No further information is available.
Mort