Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2010-4066
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 629877
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: WEST VIRGINIA
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 4822-271
Nom du produit: Raid Wasp and Hornet Killer - 17.5 oz
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Autre
Dog / Chien
Pit Bull Terrier
1
Homme
1.50
40.00
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
May 9, 2010 The product was applied to four wasp nests on the ceiling in the porch two days ago. The dog was not on the porch during application; Caller has been watching a dog that belongs to a family member for the past week and knows nothing about the dog's past medical history. Since the product was used the dog was seen eating grass in the yard and vomiting afterwards. Dog had also been very lethargic and will not eat. The dog has not had any witnessed exposure to the product nor would exposure be expected since the wasp nests were on the ceiling of the front porch where the dog cannot reach. The caller was told to take the dog to the veterinary ER immediately. Follow-up on May 23, 2010 The dog died on May 10, 2010. The dog was not taken to a veterinarian for treatment as previously recommended. This dog has since been buried in the reporter's backyard.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the delayed development of the complications reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks and biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history would appear to indicate that this dog could not have experienced significant exposure to this pesticide since it was sprayed on wasps nest located in the ceiling of a front porch. Even had casual or incidental contact with this diluted product occurred, such serious illness as reported in this dog is unexpected. Even if true pyrethroid toxicity were to occur in these case is would manifest with acute neurological complications, primarily in the form of tremors and ataxia which was not reported in this incident. Finally, this animal was never properly evaluated and treated by a DVM nor was a necropsy performed to determine a possible cause of death.