Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2010-3954
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case #: 1-23237083
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Syngenta Crop Protection Canada, Inc.
Adresse: 140 Research Lane, Research Park
Ville: Guelph
État: Ontario
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N1G4Z3
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: GEORGIA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 100-1000
Nom du produit: Demon WP in Water-Soluble Packets
Poudre mouillable ou soluble
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Weimaraner
3
Inconnu
0.17
Inconnu
Orale
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Contact treat.area/Contact surf. traitée
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-23237083- The reporter, a pet owner, indicates his animals may have been exposed to an insecticide containing the active ingredient Cypermethrin. The caller reports his son applied the product to his dog kennel a "few days" prior to the initial contact with the registrant, unknown dilution factor/application rate. The caller indicates seven 9 week Weimaraner dogs have had exposure to the application area. The caller does not specify if the animals were in the kennel at the time of the application or the re-entry interval observed. The caller speculates his son may have sprayed food/water dishes. No discreet exposure is described. The caller specifies the animals had demonstrated general malaise the day of the contact with the registrant. The caller indicates he had discussed the animal's signs with a veterinarian and had been told they may be due to a parvovirus infection. The caller was advised the signs seen would not be expected following use of the product as labeled. The animals were likely suffering from some unrelated illness. The caller was told direct exposure to wetted dilute product may result in mild self-limiting irritation to the body surfaces exposed. The caller was advised to seek veterinary assistance. On routine call back the pet owner indicated three of the animals had died ( Sub-form III, #1). They had developed rapid breathing, seizuring, rectal bleeding, and anorexia. The animals had died one day following the initial contact with the registrant. The pet owner had not brought any of the animals to the veterinarian. The remaining animals (Sub-form III, #2) were described as improved. The caller was advised the signs seen and outcome was inconsistent with exposure to the product. It was reiterated the animals should be brought to the veterinarian. The caller did not return further call back attempts. No further information is available.
Mort
It is highly unlikely that cypermethrin was involved in this case based on the symptoms described. the treating veterinarian indicated a parvo virus may be the cause.
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Wiemaraner
4
Inconnu
0.17
Inconnu
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Non
Non
Unknown/Inconnu
Contact treat.area/Contact surf. traitée
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-23237083- The reporter, a pet owner, indicates his animals may have been exposed to an insecticide containing the active ingredient Cypermethrin. The caller reports his son applied the product to his dog kennel a "few days" prior to the initial contact with the registrant, unknown dilution factor/application rate. The caller indicates seven 9 week Weimaraner dogs have had exposure to the application area. The caller does not specify if the animals were in the kennel at the time of the application or the re-entry interval observed. The caller speculates his son may have sprayed food/water dishes. No discreet exposure is described. The caller specifies the animals had demonstrated general malaise the day of the contact with the registrant. The caller indicates he had discussed the animal's signs with a veterinarian and had been told they may be due to a parvovirus infection. The caller was advised the signs seen would not be expected following use of the product as labeled. The animals were likely suffering from some unrelated illness. The caller was told direct exposure to wetted dilute product may result in mild self-limiting irritation to the body surfaces exposed. The caller was advised to seek veterinary assistance. On routine call back the pet owner indicated three of the animals had died ( Sub-form III, #1). They had developed rapid breathing, seizuring, rectal bleeding, and anorexia. The animals had died one day following the initial contact with the registrant. The pet owner had not brought any of the animals to the veterinarian. The remaining animals (Sub-form III, #2) were described as improved. The caller was advised the signs seen and outcome was inconsistent with exposure to the product. It was reiterated the animals should be brought to the veterinarian. The caller did not return further call back attempts. No further information is available.
Mineure