Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2010-3414
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case #1-23312029
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Scotts Canada Ltd.
Adresse: 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 5, Suite 101
Ville: Mississauga
État: Ontario
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: L5N2R7
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: ALBERTA
ARLA No d'homologation 29695 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: SCOTTS ECOSENSE WEED-B-GON READY-TO-USE WEED CONTROL
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Mixed breed
1
Femme
13
6
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Unknown/Inconnu
Contact treat.area/Contact surf. traitée
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-23312029- The reporter, a pet owner, calls to indicate exposure of her animal to an herbicide containing the active ingredient Iron (present as FeHEDTA). The reporter had indicated she had sprayed the ready to use product on her lawn several times over the ¿¿¿past few days¿¿¿ prior to the contact with the registrant. The last use was described as one week prior to the initial contact with the registrant. The caller does not describe a discreet exposure but rather indicates the animal had access to the application area. The animal, a 13 year old female 6 pound mixed breed dog, vomited five days after the last described application of the product. The animal then developed diarrhea one day later and panting was describe (but no onset was given). The animal was seen by a veterinarian but it is unclear from the history when the veterinary examination took place. The veterinarian noted black runny stool and placed the animal on the medications sucralfate and metronidazole. The veterinarian had communicated to the pet owner that the animal had ingested ¿¿¿something toxic¿¿¿ but the pet owner could be no more significant than that. The pet owner, lastly, communicated the animal had vomited again the afternoon of the initial contact with the registrant. The pet owner was told the active ingredient when diluted as described carries a low order of toxicity. No harm would be expected following incidental contact with the lawn or following ingestion of grass itself. The caller was advised they should continue to pursue a diagnosis with their veterinarian. No further information is available
Modérée