Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2010-1248
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR 1-21890711
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Scotts Company LLC
Adresse: 14111 Scottslawn Road
Ville: Marysville
État: Ohio
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 43041
Incident chez l'humain
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: TEXAS
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 239-2476
Nom du produit: Ortho Rose Pride Insect Disease/Mite Control Aerosol 14oz
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Inconnu
Personne affectée
Sexe: Homme
Âge: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Oui
Non
Non professionnel
Application
Inconnu
Peau
Yeux
<=15 min / <=15 min
<=30 min / <=30 min
1-21890711: A reporter called on 02/11/2010 to report his exposure to an insect disease and mite control product containing the active ingredients Acephate, Resmethrin, and Triforine. According to the reporter, he was using the product on 02/26/2010 when the can exploded during use and sprayed product in his face. When asked, the reporter said that the can itself did not hit him in the face. He rinsed his eyes with water from a hose for 1 hour because they were burning. His eyes were also very red, and the reporter reported seeing little spots and having his vision become dark. He maintains he "went blind" for 3-4 hours after the exposure. The reporter saw a physician 1 week later and was treated with unspecified drops and was told that he will need glasses. The reporter also said that his physician would like to do some unspecified tests. At the time of the report, the reporter had persistent blurred vision and red eyes. The reporter was advised that ocular exposure to the product may result in eye irritation, redness, and blurred vision; however, the signs would be expected to be transient. Long term or permanent damage and temporary blindness are not consistent with ocular exposure. At this point, the reporter said that he had not gone blind, but that he had blurred vision. The reporter was advised that had he reported the exposure after it had occurred, we would have recommended immediate medical evaluation based on the reported signs rather than waiting 1 week to see a physician. The reporter was advised that his physician may call with any questions about the product. The reporter declined the phone number for customer service to discuss product malfunction. On follow up on 03/18/2010, the reporter stated that his eyes were still red and burning and his vision was still blurry. He went to the emergency room at an unspecified time and was given medication for his eyes and his skin, as the skin near his eyes peeled while he was washing the product off. He also stated that his eyebrows were burned by the product. During this conversation, he reported that the can impacted on his little finger and also hit his face. His little finger and his entire right hand became swollen. The swelling was resolving with ice at the time of the follow up conversation. The reporter stated that he will be seeing his physician again and may need to see an eye doctor and a dermatologist. The reporter also stated that he takes depression medications, and that his depression has been worsened by his injuries.
Majeure