Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2009-5091
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 528555
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: QUEBEC
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation 28347 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 4822-538
Nom du produit: Raid Outdoor Ant Spikes - Canada
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Boston Terrier
1
Homme
1
12
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
>3 days <=1 wk / >3 jours <=1 sem
Oui
Non
Fully Recovered / Complètement rétabli
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
9/4/2009 Caller's dog developed vomiting, drooling, weakness, lethargy, and tremors last night. Caller believes that an ant spike in the yard may have teeth marks in it, but no direct exposure was witnessed. 9/8/2009 Callback attempted to the original caller. A message was left requesting follow up information. 9/9/2009 The original caller is returning the previous message. The dog was taken to a veterinarian, who determined the dog's symptoms were not caused by the product. The dog was prescribed antibiotics and other medications, and the dog has been improving.
Modérée
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Exposure history appears to indicate that even though the bait stations had been chewed on, it was still intact such that majority of the bait pesticide still remained within the bait station housing. Secondly, the potential dose of abamectin this large dog could have received from a single ant bait station is well below any dose of this compound that could potentially lead to illness in a dog and is unlikely to have been the cause of this dog's illness. The dose of abamectin used within the ant bait station is significant smaller than the dose of ivermectin, a similar compound to abamectin, used therapeutically by veterinarians to treat heartworm in dogs. Finally, follow-up with the DVM confirmed that the DVM had diagnosed the dog with an alternative etiology and that the ant spike had been ruled out as the causative agent.