Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2009-3992
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: Prosar 1-19551601
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: MICHIGAN
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-147
Nom du produit: UltraGuard One Spot Flea Egg/Larvae Treatment for Cats/Kittens
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Himalayan
1
Femme
5
Inconnu
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-19551601: A reporter (cat owner) called on 08/17/2009 to report the exposure of her 4 cats to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene. According to the reporter, the product was applied to the cats on 08/11/2009. On 08/14/2009, Cat #1 (1st Subform III) was vocalizing and breathing deeply and less often than normal. Cat #1 began to spasm on 08/15/2009 and died on 08/16/2009. The cat was not evaluated by a veterinarian. On 08/17/2009, Cat #2 (2nd Subform III) began acting lethargic. The other 2 cats were asymptomatic at the time of the initial report. The reporter was advised that the active ingredient has little to no mammalian toxicity, and adverse reactions would not be expected. A recommendation was made to bathe the Cat #2 with a hand dish soap. The reporter was also advised that if the signs persist, Cat #2 should be evaluated by a veterinarian to determine the cause of the signs. The reporter called again on 08/17/2009 to report that Cat #2 had been bathed and died a short time later. The reporter was advised to consider necropsy to determine the cause of death. The reporter called on 08/21/2009 to report that Cat #3 (3rd Subform III) had died on 08/20/2009. It is unknown what signs Cat #3 had prior to death. All 4 cats had been bathed after the initial report. At the time of the most recent report, Cat #4 was lethargic and not eating. None of the cats had been evaluated by a veterinarian since the start of their signs. The reporter was again advised that the signs reported are not expected with product use. The reporter was encouraged to have Cat #4 evaluated by a veterinarian. The reporter called back on 08/31/2009 to report that Cat #4 had died on 08/30/2009. Cat #4 had not been evaluated by a veterinarian. No further information was obtained.
Mort
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Himalayan
1
Femme
4
Inconnu
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>3 days <=1 wk / >3 jours <=1 sem
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-19551601: A reporter (cat owner) called on 08/17/2009 to report the exposure of her 4 cats to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene. According to the reporter, the product was applied to the cats on 08/11/2009. On 08/14/2009, Cat #1 (1st Subform III) was vocalizing and breathing deeply and less often than normal. Cat #1 began to spasm on 08/15/2009 and died on 08/16/2009. The cat was not evaluated by a veterinarian. On 08/17/2009, Cat #2 (2nd Subform III) began acting lethargic. The other 2 cats were asymptomatic at the time of the initial report. The reporter was advised that the active ingredient has little to no mammalian toxicity, and adverse reactions would not be expected. A recommendation was made to bathe the Cat #2 with a hand dish soap. The reporter was also advised that if the signs persist, Cat #2 should be evaluated by a veterinarian to determine the cause of the signs. The reporter called again on 08/17/2009 to report that Cat #2 had been bathed and died a short time later. The reporter was advised to consider necropsy to determine the cause of death. The reporter called on 08/21/2009 to report that Cat #3 (3rd Subform III) had died on 08/20/2009. It is unknown what signs Cat #3 had prior to death. All 4 cats had been bathed after the initial report. At the time of the most recent report, Cat #4 was lethargic and not eating. None of the cats had been evaluated by a veterinarian since the start of their signs. The reporter was again advised that the signs reported are not expected with product use. The reporter was encouraged to have Cat #4 evaluated by a veterinarian. The reporter called back on 08/31/2009 to report that Cat #4 had died on 08/30/2009. Cat #4 had not been evaluated by a veterinarian. No further information was obtained.
Mort
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Unknown breed
1
Homme
6
Inconnu
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>3 days <=1 wk / >3 jours <=1 sem
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-19551601: A reporter (cat owner) called on 08/17/2009 to report the exposure of her 4 cats to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene. According to the reporter, the product was applied to the cats on 08/11/2009. On 08/14/2009, Cat #1 (1st Subform III) was vocalizing and breathing deeply and less often than normal. Cat #1 began to spasm on 08/15/2009 and died on 08/16/2009. The cat was not evaluated by a veterinarian. On 08/17/2009, Cat #2 (2nd Subform III) began acting lethargic. The other 2 cats were asymptomatic at the time of the initial report. The reporter was advised that the active ingredient has little to no mammalian toxicity, and adverse reactions would not be expected. A recommendation was made to bathe the Cat #2 with a hand dish soap. The reporter was also advised that if the signs persist, Cat #2 should be evaluated by a veterinarian to determine the cause of the signs. The reporter called again on 08/17/2009 to report that Cat #2 had been bathed and died a short time later. The reporter was advised to consider necropsy to determine the cause of death. The reporter called on 08/21/2009 to report that Cat #3 (3rd Subform III) had died on 08/20/2009. It is unknown what signs Cat #3 had prior to death. All 4 cats had been bathed after the initial report. At the time of the most recent report, Cat #4 was lethargic and not eating. None of the cats had been evaluated by a veterinarian since the start of their signs. The reporter was again advised that the signs reported are not expected with product use. The reporter was encouraged to have Cat #4 evaluated by a veterinarian. The reporter called back on 08/31/2009 to report that Cat #4 had died on 08/30/2009. Cat #4 had not been evaluated by a veterinarian. No further information was obtained.
Mort
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Himalayan
1
Homme
8
Inconnu
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois
Système
Persisted until death
Inconnu
Inconnu
Unknown/Inconnu
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-19551601: A reporter (cat owner) called on 08/17/2009 to report the exposure of her 4 cats to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene. According to the reporter, the product was applied to the cats on 08/11/2009. On 08/14/2009, Cat #1 (1st Subform III) was vocalizing and breathing deeply and less often than normal. Cat #1 began to spasm on 08/15/2009 and died on 08/16/2009. The cat was not evaluated by a veterinarian. On 08/17/2009, Cat #2 (2nd Subform III) began acting lethargic. The other 2 cats were asymptomatic at the time of the initial report. The reporter was advised that the active ingredient has little to no mammalian toxicity, and adverse reactions would not be expected. A recommendation was made to bathe the Cat #2 with a hand dish soap. The reporter was also advised that if the signs persist, Cat #2 should be evaluated by a veterinarian to determine the cause of the signs. The reporter called again on 08/17/2009 to report that Cat #2 had been bathed and died a short time later. The reporter was advised to consider necropsy to determine the cause of death. The reporter called on 08/21/2009 to report that Cat #3 (3rd Subform III) had died on 08/20/2009. It is unknown what signs Cat #3 had prior to death. All 4 cats had been bathed after the initial report. At the time of the most recent report, Cat #4 was lethargic and not eating. None of the cats had been evaluated by a veterinarian since the start of their signs. The reporter was again advised that the signs reported are not expected with product use. The reporter was encouraged to have Cat #4 evaluated by a veterinarian. The reporter called back on 08/31/2009 to report that Cat #4 had died on 08/30/2009. Cat #4 had not been evaluated by a veterinarian. No further information was obtained.
Mort