Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2009-3948
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: Prosar 1-19242974
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: OHIO
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-151
Nom du produit: UltraGuard Flea/Tick Drops for Dogs/Puppies Over 60 lbs
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-147
Nom du produit: UltraGuard One Spot Flea Egg/Larvae Treatment for Cats/Kittens
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Domestic Shorthair
1
Femme
0.25
Inconnu
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>2 hrs <=8 hrs / > 2 h < = 8 h
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-19242974: A reporter (pet owner) called on 07/21/2009 to report the exposure of her cat to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene and her dog to a flea and tick product containing the active ingredient Phenothrin. According to the reporter, the feline product was applied to the cat (1st Subform III) and the canine product was applied to the dog (2nd Subform III) on 07/19/2009. The reporter stated that the cat and dog are not friendly with each other, so no contact between the two pets would have occurred following product application. Three hours after the products were applied, the cat developed lethargy, anorexia and was not drinking. The dog developed vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, and anorexia. The signs were persistent at the time of the report. The reporter was advised that the active ingredient in the feline product has little to no mammalian toxicity and would not be expected to result in the signs described. The canine product would also not be expected to result in adverse signs as described. The reporter was advised to bathe both animals in hand dish soap and have them evaluated by a veterinarian to determine what is causing the signs. On follow up, the reporter stated that the cat never improved and died before she took her to a veterinarian. The dog continued to have signs of diarrhea and anorexia. The reporter was encouraged to have the dog evaluated by a veterinarian. On follow up on 07/27/2009, the reporter stated that she did take the dog to the veterinarian but elected euthanasia as the dog started to lose weight and the signs persisted. Blood work results were pending. No further information was obtained.
Mort
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Mixed Breed
1
Homme
3
75
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>2 hrs <=8 hrs / > 2 h < = 8 h
Système
Persisted until death
Oui
Inconnu
Euthanised / Euthanasie
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-19242974: A reporter (pet owner) called on 07/21/2009 to report the exposure of her cat to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene and her dog to a flea and tick product containing the active ingredient Phenothrin. According to the reporter, the feline product was applied to the cat (1st Subform III) and the canine product was applied to the dog (2nd Subform III) on 07/19/2009. The reporter stated that the cat and dog are not friendly with each other, so no contact between the two pets would have occurred following product application. Three hours after the products were applied, the cat developed lethargy, anorexia and was not drinking. The dog developed vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, and anorexia. The signs were persistent at the time of the report. The reporter was advised that the active ingredient in the feline product has little to no mammalian toxicity and would not be expected to result in the signs described. The canine product would also not be expected to result in adverse signs as described. The reporter was advised to bathe both animals in hand dish soap and have them evaluated by a veterinarian to determine what is causing the signs. On follow up, the reporter stated that the cat never improved and died before she took her to a veterinarian. The dog continued to have signs of diarrhea and anorexia. The reporter was encouraged to have the dog evaluated by a veterinarian. On follow up on 07/27/2009, the reporter stated that she did take the dog to the veterinarian but elected euthanasia as the dog started to lose weight and the signs persisted. Blood work results were pending. No further information was obtained.
Mort