Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2009-3132
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 478136
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: OHIO
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 4822-469
Nom du produit: OFF! Powerpad Lamp Refill
Autre (préciser)
Solid lamp stripInconnu
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Great Dane
1
Homme
0.42
60
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Oui
Non
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
5/27/2009 Caller reports that two of the product refills have gone missing sometime in the past two to 8 hours. She suspects her dog may have eaten them, but she is not sure. The caller's dog has developed lethargy, diarrhea, anorexia. The dog has had no witnessed exposure to the product. 6/9/2009 Callback attempted to original caller. A message was left requesting follow up information. 6/11/2009 Callback to original caller for follow up information. The dog was taken to a veterinarian for an evaluation. The dog was given something for pain control. Caller brought the dog home where the dog died. No cause of death was determined as the owner was not able to afford advanced testing or treatment.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. The possibility of product exposure appears to be based on speculation as there is no visible evidence that the dog actually ingested the pesticide refills. Secondly, the ingestion of d-cis trans allethrin containing refill strips may be expected to produce primarily stomach irritation resulting in vomiting, however, such a symptom was not reported in this case, thus suggesting that exposure may not have occurred. When considering the body of regulatory data and post-marketing data as well as the weight of scientific peer reviewed evidence on the d-cis tran allethrin used in this product such a causal relationship appears to be scientifically implausible even if the animal had managed to ingest two full strips of the lamp refill. Unfortunately, the pet owner did not seek prompt medical attention nor was she able to afford the necessary diagnostic testing to determine the cause of the illness and identify potentially life saving treatment interventions.