Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2009-2716
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: Prosar 1-18788941
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: OKLAHOMA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-147
Nom du produit: UltraGuard One Spot Flea Egg/Larvae Treatment for Cats/Kittens
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Domestic Shorthair
1
Femme
0.29
3
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-18788941: A reporter (kitten owner) called on 06/011/2009 to report the exposure of 2 kittens to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene. According to the reporter, a non-company flea shampoo was used to bathe the kittens on 06/09/2009. The product was then applied to both kittens. On 06/10/2009, both kittens were very lethargic, not eating, and "trying to use the litter box but nothing is coming out." The reporter was advised that the product is an insect growth regulator and is not designed to affect adult fleas. Because the product has very little to no mammalian toxicity, it is not expected to result in reactions. A recommendation was made to bathe the kittens in a non-insecticidal shampoo. A recommendation was also made to have a veterinarian evaluate the kittens and consider other causes for their signs. Finally, it was recommended to contact the maker of the non-company shampoo to determine that product's toxic profile. On follow up on 06/12/2009, the reporter stated that both kittens had been bathed following the initial report. Cat #1 (1st Subform III) died overnight. Cat #2 (2nd Subform III) was taken to the veterinarian on 06/12/2009 who advised bathing the kitten a second time. At the time of the report, Cat #2 had been bathed again in Dawn dish soap. She was still lethargic but had eaten some. The reporter was advised again that the product has a very wide margin of safety and adverse effects are not anticipated. A recommendation was made to get information on the non-company shampoo and have Cat #2 re-evaluated in case hydration, appetite stimulants, or force feeding is needed. A recommendation was also made to consider necropsy to determine the cause of death for Cat #1. No further information was obtained.
Mort
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
Domestic Shorthair
1
Femme
0.29
3
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Unknown/Inconnu
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-18788941: A reporter (kitten owner) called on 06/011/2009 to report the exposure of 2 kittens to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene. According to the reporter, a non-company flea shampoo was used to bathe the kittens on 06/09/2009. The product was then applied to both kittens. On 06/10/2009, both kittens were very lethargic, not eating, and "trying to use the litter box but nothing is coming out." The reporter was advised that the product is an insect growth regulator and is not designed to affect adult fleas. Because the product has very little to no mammalian toxicity, it is not expected to result in reactions. A recommendation was made to bathe the kittens in a non-insecticidal shampoo. A recommendation was also made to have a veterinarian evaluate the kittens and consider other causes for their signs. Finally, it was recommended to contact the maker of the non-company shampoo to determine that product's toxic profile. On follow up on 06/12/2009, the reporter stated that both kittens had been bathed following the initial report. Cat #1 (1st Subform III) died overnight. Cat #2 (2nd Subform III) was taken to the veterinarian on 06/12/2009 who advised bathing the kitten a second time. At the time of the report, Cat #2 had been bathed again in Dawn dish soap. She was still lethargic but had eaten some. The reporter was advised again that the product has a very wide margin of safety and adverse effects are not anticipated. A recommendation was made to get information on the non-company shampoo and have Cat #2 re-evaluated in case hydration, appetite stimulants, or force feeding is needed. A recommendation was also made to consider necropsy to determine the cause of death for Cat #1. No further information was obtained.
Modérée