Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2008-5594
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 350779
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: ONTARIO
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation 27761 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 4822-472
Nom du produit: Raid Double Control Ant Baits 2 - Canada
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
DSH
1
Homme
10
10.00
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Unknown/Inconnu
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
7/23/2008 Caller reports placing 2 baits outside of the home 1 week ago, and found bait stations empty after a heavy rain. Caller's cat is currently being treated by a veterinarian for undiagnosed pain. The cat did not have any witnessed exposure to the product. 7/28/2008 Attempted callback to original caller. A message was left for caller requesting follow up information. 7/30/2008 Attempted callback to original caller. A message was left for caller requesting follow up information.
Modérée
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and development of the illness in cat is inconceivable and lacks and biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is highly speculative and lacks any valid exposure scenario.