Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2008-5552
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 304668
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: ONTARIO
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation 18449 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Raid Liquid Ant Killer 100 ml (Canada)
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Australian Shepherd (Aussie)
1
Femme
7
30
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Non
Non
Fully Recovered / Complètement rétabli
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
4/4/2008 Caller's sister applied product in home one day ago. Sister's dog developed vomiting, diarrhea, and bloody stools today. Dog has had no known exposure to product. 4/17/2008 Callback placed to original caller. A message was left for caller requesting follow up information. 4/18/2008 Callback placed to original caller. Caller's sister phoned veterinarian regarding the dog's symptoms, but no examination was performed and no treatments were performed. The dog is asymptomatic now.
Modérée
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and development of a severe and fatal illness is inconceivable and lacks and biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is extremely vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had the dog ingested material that had been sprayed with this insecticide, an active concentration of borax at 7.7% would not be expected to lead to severe illness. Finally, the dog was never evaluated by a veterinarian to determine the cause of illness.