Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2008-4590
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 369268
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Adresse: 8810 Tenth Ave North
Ville: Minneapolis
État: MN
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 55427-4319
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: TEXAS
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 1021-1608-79529
Nom du produit: BLACK FLAG Kills Ants Roaches Spiders Formula 19
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Rat Terrier
1
Femme
0.58
1.5
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
8/28/2008 Caller reports that the product was applied 3 or 4 days ago. Caller's dog stopped eating yesterday, and today is lethargic, vomiting, and has blood in the feces. Dog did not have any witnessed direct exposure to product. 9/13/2008 Callback attempted to original caller. A message was left requesting follow up information. 9/18/2008 Callback to original caller for follow up information. Caller reports that the dog died at home, and that no treatments were performed. Cause of death was not definitively determined however, when the owner called a veterinarian the veterinarian surmised that the dog is likely suffering from Parvo virus given its young age and lack of adequate preventative veterinary care.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and development of a severe and fatal illness is inconceivable and lacks and biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is extremely vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had the dog ingested material that had been sprayed with this insecticide, an active concentration of permethrin of 0.20% and a pyrethrin concentration of 0.05% would not be expected to lead to fatal illness, especially given that their are flea adulticide products on the market for direct application to dogs that contain permethrin concentrations greater than 100X higher than in this particular insecticide. Thirdly, a medical evaluation by a licensed veterinarian in order to determine the cause of the illness was never sought.