Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2008-0835
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 277283
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez l'humain
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: ARKANSAS
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Raid Flying Insect Killer Formula 6 Outdoor Fresh Scent 18 oz.
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Personal use / Usage personnel
Non
Professionnel de la santé
Sexe: Femme
Âge: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
Système
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
Oui
Oui
Inconnu
Non professionnel
Application
Aucun
Peau
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
1/8/2008Email from a physician treating a patient that intentionally exposed self to product. Physician is requesting product ingredients.Call was placed to physician to provide information. Unable to reach physician, and a an email reply was sent to the physician.1/9/2008Physician calling, and reports that patient has been regularly spraying self with product to keep flies off. The patient has had two prior admissions for metabolic acidosis, and the cause has not been determined. Lactates were normal during each admission. Patient was in respiratory failure on the most recent admission. The patient was intubated and treated with sodium bicarbonate, and recovered. Patient has a medical history of Type II Diabetes Mellitus.1/23/2008Call back attempted to hospital, and physician did not answer the page. An email was sent to physician requesting any additional information regarding the cause of patient's symptoms.
Majeure
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. The signs and symptoms reported in this case are not consistent with the known toxicology of the material involved at the concentrations used in this spray, even following the type of gross misuse us of the product by the patient. The weight of medical and scientific evidence does not support a correlation between this patient's illness and the type of skin exposure as reported in this case. Ready-to-use pyrethroid based house insect sprays such as this product have a very wide margin of safety, such that even direct skin contact with spray would not be expected to cause any complications other than possibly localized skin irritation. It is important to note that many over-the-counter products used to treat human head lice typically contain pyrethroid class insecticides including permethrin at concentrations/potencies higher than that used in this spray product.