Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2008-0833
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 259874
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: TEXAS
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Raid Double Control Small Roach Baits 12 ct
Appât
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Other / Autre
préciser Exotic
Rabbit
1
Homme
0.5
2
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
>2 hrs <=8 hrs / > 2 h < = 8 h
Système
Persisted until death
Inconnu
Oui
1
Day(s) / Jour(s)
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser No exposure is evident or was witnessed. Owner admits that she is merely speculating that pet may have been exposed.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
11/12/2007 1:26:04 PMCaller concerned that rabbit might have licked the product this morning. She relates her maid found the animal lethargic and not moving. Caller is wondering if this is product related. She is not sure the rabbit even got into the product. No one saw the rabbit near the bait station, however, the rabbit is allowed to roam around the room where the bait is sitting out. Owner was instructed to bring the rabbit to a DVM ASAP.11/27/2007 4:18:35 PMFollow-up with owner. She did take the rabbit to the vet. They now suspected that the rabbit may have chewed on an electrical chord in the home. There was rear paralysis per DVM. The rabbit died that night. No necropsy.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews.There is no evidence to suggest that this rabbit ever had contact with the bait station. Even had the rabbit licked the outside of the hard plastic housing surrounding the still intact bait inside, there would be negligible to no exposure to abamectin. Even had the rabbit ingested the entire contents of this bait station, the potential dose of abamectin this rabbit could have received from a single bait station is well below any dose of this compound that could potentially lead to significant illness. Finally, an independent veterinary evaluation has determined another unrelated cause for this rabbit's illness.