Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2007-8494
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 199139
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: ONTARIO
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation 27761 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Raid Double Control Ant Baits 2 - Canada
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Mixed Breed
1
Homme
1
45
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
<=30 min / <=30 min
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Inconnu
Non
Fully Recovered / Complètement rétabli
Other / Autre
préciser Unclear how patient was exposed. No witnessed exposure.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
6/15/2007 Owner called to report that dog has developed drooling, urinary incontinence, agitated and twitching. They suspect that dog has been poisoned somehow but they do not know to what compound. They recently put out these ant baits in the home, but the caller admits to not knowing whether or not dog got into one of these baits. Caller has already given the dog hydrogen peroxide in an attempt to induce vomiting. Dog has not vomited.Follow-up on 6/26/2007Owner states that dog is doing fine. DVM determined dog suffered an illness completely unrelated to the bait station.
Modérée
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews.Exposure history reported in this case is based solely on speculation. Furthermore, even if a dog consumed the contents of one of these ant bait stations, such symptomatology would be unexpected. Finally, dog was confirmed by a DVM as experiencing an illness unrelated to the ant bait station.