Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2007-5665
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case 1-15014241
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Syngenta Crop Protection
Adresse: 410 Swing Road
Ville: Greensboro
État: North Carolina
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 27419
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: SOUTH CAROLINA
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 100-1091
Nom du produit: Reward Landscape And Aquatic Herbicide - EPA 100-1091
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Other / Autre
Specify Type: Private Community Ponds
Inconnu
Autre
Dog / Chien
Unknown Breed
1
Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Inconnu
Inconnu
Not recovered / Non rétabli
Contact treat.area/Contact surf. traitée
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
The product was applied to a pond last month 1 dog died from either being in the pond or drinking the water. Caller has many questions about the product. Caller is looking for more information regarding an incident in a residential community that her company manages: They have the ponds in these communities treated with Reward, monthly. They apparently post no specific restrictions about re-entry, because the ponds are perpetually posted. The caller has very few details about the incident. The last application of the product was sometime early last month -- precise date unknown. Two dogs became sick around that time, and some access to the pond is apparently suspect -- one dead. No other details are available.
Mort
Reward aquatic herbicide products contain the herbicide diquat. While the MSDS will reflect significant toxicity, it must be kept in mind that this refers to the concentrated product prior to application. After application according to label instructions, the product loses it's toxic potential for mammals and fish very rapidly, binding irreversibly to organic matter. These products typically carry a re-entry interval for watering animals of 24 hours, and this is intended to be very conservative. To be conservative, this would be the best recommendation for dogs going into treated waters, since the potential for significant water consumption exists. Systemic toxicity from such an application could only result from substantial consumption of water treated almost immediately, prior, and this seems fairly unlikely, but only a necropsy would likely determine the cause of death for certain.