Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2007-4563
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 187149
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez l'humain
Pays: CANADA
État: NOVA SCOTIA
ARLA No d'homologation 25741 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: RAID WASP & HORNET KILLER 4
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Personne affectée
Sexe: Femme
Âge: >64 yrs / > 64 ans
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Non professionnel
Autre
Aucun
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
5/15/2007 Caller and her husband have sensitivities to products and have underlying medical conditions. 7 days ago the caller's landlord used the product outside their apartment building and ever since the caller has had difficulty breathing and congestion of her chest. Caller's husband has developed what appears to be a skin reaction and hives. No known or direct exposure to spray is reported. No treatments have been conducted. Caller and her husband were instructed to seek medical attention given persistent symptoms. Follow-up was attempted on 5/22 and 5/23. Both times the consumers¿¿¿ phone line was unavailable. Case closed on 5/23 due to difficulty in following up.
Modérée
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. With the history as provided by the caller, there is no defined point of direct contact with this particular pesticide. Once the product is sprayed, allowed to settle, and dries, there would be little rerelease of actual material into the air that would cause ongoing respiratory symptoms 7 days after application. Possibility of exposure in this case is negligible, especially since product was applied outside of residence be another user.
Personne affectée
Sexe: Homme
Âge: >64 yrs / > 64 ans
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Non professionnel
Autre
Aucun
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
5/15/2007 Caller and her husband have sensitivities to products and have underlying medical conditions. 7 days ago the caller's landlord used the product outside their apartment building and ever since the caller has had difficulty breathing and congestion of her chest. Caller's husband has developed what appears to be a skin reaction and hives. No known or direct exposure to spray is reported. No treatments have been conducted. Caller and her husband were instructed to seek medical attention given persistent symptoms. Follow-up was attempted on 5/22 and 5/23. Both times the consumers¿¿¿ phone line was unavailable. Case closed on 5/23 due to difficulty in following up.
Modérée
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. With the history as provided by the caller, there is no defined point of direct contact with this particular pesticide. Once the product is sprayed, allowed to settle, and dries, there would be little rerelease of actual material into the air that would cause ongoing respiratory symptoms 7 days after application. Possibility of exposure in this case is negligible, especially since product was applied outside of residence be another user.