New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2023-1167
Registrant Reference Number: 3402414
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Address: 1 Webster Street
City: Brantford
Prov / State: ON
Country: Canada
Postal Code: N3T 5R1
Human
Country: CANADA
Prov / State: BRITISH COLUMBIA
PMRA Registration No. 32435 PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No.
Product Name: RAID Max Crawling Insect Bug Killer 4, 500g [Canada]
PMRA Registration No. 32436 PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No.
Product Name: RAID Home Insect Killer 2, 350g [Canada]
Yes
Unknown
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Data Subject
Sex: Male
Age: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
System
Unknown / Inconnu
No
No
Unknown
Non-occupational
Application
What was the activity? Please refer to field 13 on Subform II or field 17 of subform III for a detailed description regarding the activity
None
Unknown
<=15 min / <=15 min
>30 min <=2 hrs / >30 min <=2 h
10/7/2022 Caller reports about 3 hours ago he used the Home Insect Killer in his dad's room on the windowsill. He had the window open for ventilation. About 2 hours ago he started to experience a slight headache that made him dizzy. On a scale of 1-10 his headache is at a 5. About 15 minutes ago he used the Max Crawling Insect Bug Killer and during the application of both products he wasn't wearing a mask. His symptoms have not worsened and he hasn't done anything to self treat. He can still smell the product and is inquiring if this smell could be causing his headache. Confirmed with caller he did not have a direct exposure to the product or inhale the product from the container. 10/10/2022 Attempted call back to consumer. Someone answered the phone and disconnected while this agent was introducing herself.
Minor
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews.