Incident Report
Subform I: General Information
1. Report Type.
New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2019-5083
2. Registrant Information.
Registrant Reference Number: USA-BAYERBAH-2019-US0050744 (Report 593555)
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Bayer inc
Address: 2920 Matheson Blvd
City: Mississaugua
Prov / State: ON
Country: Canada
Postal Code: L4W 5R6
3. Select the appropriate subform(s) for the incident.
Domestic Animal
4. Date registrant was first informed of the incident.
26-AUG-19
5. Location of incident.
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: TENNESSEE
6. Date incident was first observed.
25-AUG-19
Product Description
7. a) Provide the active ingredient and, if available, the registration number and product name (include all tank mixes). If the product is not registered provide a submission number.
Active(s)
PMRA Registration No.
PMRA Submission No.
EPA Registration No. 11556-155
Product Name: Seresto Large Dog collar
- Active Ingredient(s)
- FLUMETHRIN
- Guarantee/concentration 4.5 %
- IMIDACLOPRID
- Guarantee/concentration 10 %
7. b) Type of formulation.
Other (specify)
COLLAR
Application Information
8. Product was applied?
Yes
9. Application Rate.
1
Other Units: COLLAR
10. Site pesticide was applied to (select all that apply).
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
11. Provide any additional information regarding application (how it was applied, amount applied, the size of the area treated etc).
On 24-Aug-2019, an 8 week old, approximately 4 pound, intact, male, Domestic Shorthair cat, in unknown condition, with no known concomitant medical conditions, was secondarily exposed to a Seresto Large Dog (Flumethrin-Imidacloprid) collar that was worn by a dog in the home. It was unknown if direct contact with the collar occurred.
To be determined by Registrant
12. In your opinion, was the product used according to the label instructions?
No
Subform III: Domestic Animal Incident Report
1. Source of Report
Animal's Owner
2. Type of animal affected
Cat / Chat
3. Breed
Domestic Shorthair
4. Number of animals affected
1
5. Sex
Male
6. Age (provide a range if necessary )
0.15
7. Weight (provide a range if necessary )
1.814
kg
8. Route(s) of exposure
Skin
9. What was the length of exposure?
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
10. Time between exposure and onset of symptoms
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
11. List all symptoms
System
- Nervous and Muscular Systems
12. How long did the symptoms last?
Unknown / Inconnu
13. Was medical treatment provided? Provide details in question 17.
Unknown
14. a) Was the animal hospitalized?
Unknown
14. b) How long was the animal hospitalized?
15. Outcome of the incident
Died
16. How was the animal exposed?
Other / Autre
specify secondarily exposed to collar that was worn by a dog, unknown if direct contact occurred
17. Provide any additional details about the incident
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
On approximately 25-Aug-2019, the cat exhibited lethargy and seizures.
On 26-Aug-2019, the cat died. The cat was not evaluated by a veterinarian and no necropsy was performed.
To be determined by Registrant
18. Severity classification (if there is more than 1 possible classification
Death
19. Provide supplemental information here
O - Unclassifiable/unassessable No real off-label use not used on cat. No product exposure described. Even with accidental exposure, the reported signs are not expected. It is more likely that lethargy, seizures and death were due to other unrelated causes in this very young cat. The product is not anticipated to cause serious neurological disorders such as seizures or death after exposure of the product as the controlled release mechanism assures release of only low doses of active ingredient at a time. Even with oral product exposure, seizures are not seen. Various etiologies exist for seizure events or paroxysmal signs, e.g. heart disorder, development disorder, metabolic disorder, infection, intoxication, idiopathic epilepsy, trauma, neoplasms. Time to onset short. A product relation is deemed unlikely, however due to no information about the root cause, a product relation for the case was considered unassessable.