Incident Report
Subform I: General Information
1. Report Type.
New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2018-4961
2. Registrant Information.
Registrant Reference Number: 2018-CA-02772
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Merck Animal Health (Intervet Canada Corp)
Address: 6750 Transcanada Highway
City: Kirkland
Prov / State: Quebec
Country: Canada
Postal Code: H9H 4M7
3. Select the appropriate subform(s) for the incident.
Residues in Food
4. Date registrant was first informed of the incident.
20-AUG-18
5. Location of incident.
Country: CANADA
Prov / State: ALBERTA
6. Date incident was first observed.
27-JUN-18
Product Description
7. a) Provide the active ingredient and, if available, the registration number and product name (include all tank mixes). If the product is not registered provide a submission number.
Active(s)
PMRA Registration No. 27829
PMRA Submission No.
EPA Registration No. 773-74
Product Name: Saber Pour On
7. b) Type of formulation.
Application Information
8. Product was applied?
Yes
9. Application Rate.
Unknown
10. Site pesticide was applied to (select all that apply).
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
11. Provide any additional information regarding application (how it was applied, amount applied, the size of the area treated etc).
Narrative: Suspected residues in milk reported by the herd vet on 20 Aug 2018. The herd vet reported that a dairy producer used Saber Pour On on approximately 20 of their lactating dairy cows, and resulted in the dumping of the milk. Residues were found in the milk. The testing method used is not known. There was no health event to the cattle. A follow-up is expected.Follow-up 06 Sept 2018: Additional information was received from the herd vet. On 26 June 2018, 4 lactating dairy cows was applied the Saber Pour On. The cows were sampled individually on 26 and 27 June 2018 at milking. A sample was also taken from the bulk tank in the truck on the 27 June 2018 to check for residues of Lambda-Cyhalothrin. The sample from the tank was considered positive at 11 ng/gm (limit is 10 ng/gm), and the contents of the truck were discarded. On 28 June 2018 a sample from 1 of the lactating dairy cows was 20 ng/gm and the other 3 were below 10 ng/gm (negative). As of 01 July 2018 all the dairy cows were negative for Lambda-Cyhalothrin. Nothing further is expected.Follow-up 24 Sept 2018, additional information was received, the complete report was received. Clarification on result samples taken from the individual cows on 28 June 2018. Cow #1 was negative(10ng/gm) in the AM and PM, Cow#2 was negative in the AM but positive at in the PM at 17 ng/gm, Cow#3 was negative in the AM and positive in the PM 18 ng/gm, Cow#4 was positive both in the AM and PM 20 and 42 ng/gm respectively. A second sample from a bulk tank had been taken and was negative. No other additions have been made. Nothing further is expected.
To be determined by Registrant
12. In your opinion, was the product used according to the label instructions?
Unknown
Subform V: Residues in Food
1. Pesticide(s) and degradate(s) analysed for
Lambda-Cyhalothrin
2. Concentration of pesticide/degradate in food
42
Other Units ng/gm
3. Corresponding limit of detection
10
Other Units ng/gm
4. Sample Type
Raw Agricultural commodity
5. Method of analysis (include if a confirmatory method was used in addition to the screening method)
unknown
Sample Information
6. What is the reason the sample was collected (e.g. complaint, inspection, process monitoring)?
process monitoring
7. What organization collected the sample?
Other
8. From what point in the distribution channel was the sample taken?
Farm
9. How large was the food commodity from which the sample was taken?
4 cows and bulk tank
10. How many samples were taken?
14
11. How large was the sample size?
Unknown
12. What action was taken based on the violative residue?
Shipment destroyed
For Registrant use only
14. Provide supplemental information here
Individual samples from 4 cows( 3 times), and 2 from Bulk tank