Incident Report

Subform I: General Information

1. Report Type.

New incident report

Incident Report Number: 2017-2164

2. Registrant Information.

Registrant Reference Number: 2017KP108

Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Bayer Inc

Address: 2920 matheson BLVD

City: Mississaugua

Prov / State: ON

Country: Canada

Postal Code: L4W 5R6

3. Select the appropriate subform(s) for the incident.

Domestic Animal

4. Date registrant was first informed of the incident.

19-APR-17

5. Location of incident.

Country: UNITED STATES

Prov / State: UNKNOWN

6. Date incident was first observed.

Unknown

Product Description

7. a) Provide the active ingredient and, if available, the registration number and product name (include all tank mixes). If the product is not registered provide a submission number.

Active(s)

---

PMRA Registration No.       PMRA Submission No.       EPA Registration No. Unknown

Product Name: advantage II unknown

• Active Ingredient(s)
  • IMIDACLOPRID
    • Guarantee/concentration 9.1 %
  • PYRIPROXYFEN
    • Guarantee/concentration .46 %

---

7. b) Type of formulation.

Liquid

Application Information

8. Product was applied?

Yes

9. Application Rate.

Unknown

10. Site pesticide was applied to (select all that apply).

Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique

11. Provide any additional information regarding application (how it was applied, amount applied, the size of the area treated etc).

On an unknown date in 2014, a 16 year old, female, feline, of unknown breed and weight, in unknown condition, with concomitant medical conditions of a flea allergy and allergic dermatitis, was administered 1 tube of Advantage II(cat-unspecified) (Imidacloprid-Pyriproxyfen) topically by the owner.

To be determined by Registrant

12. In your opinion, was the product used according to the label instructions?

Yes

Subform III: Domestic Animal Incident Report

1. Source of Report

Other

2. Type of animal affected

Cat / Chat

3. Breed

Unknown

4. Number of animals affected

1

5. Sex

Female

6. Age (provide a range if necessary )

16

7. Weight (provide a range if necessary )

Unknown

8. Route(s) of exposure

Skin

9. What was the length of exposure?

>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois

10. Time between exposure and onset of symptoms

Unknown / Inconnu

11. List all symptoms

System

• General
  • Symptom - Death

12. How long did the symptoms last?

>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois

13. Was medical treatment provided? Provide details in question 17.

No

14. a) Was the animal hospitalized?

No

14. b) How long was the animal hospitalized?

15. Outcome of the incident

Died

16. How was the animal exposed?

Treatment / Traitement

17. Provide any additional details about the incident

(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms

On an unknown date post application, in 2014, the feline died. It was unknown if the feline was examined by a veterinarian and no necropsy was performed. Due to the sensitive nature of the communication, specific relevant event details were not obtained, nor will such be sought. The reason for the initial phone call was to discuss the use of the product and not to report the death of the patient. No further information expected. This case is closed. Note : previous exposure was well tolerated by animal.

---

To be determined by Registrant

18. Severity classification (if there is more than 1 possible classification

Death

19. Provide supplemental information here

Death not expected after product application, as inconsistent with pharmaco-toxicological product profile. Product has wide margin of safety. Oral LD50 in rat 642 mg/kg BW. 24-fold overdosage tolerated by cats without showing any side effect. Animal involved in this case was geriatric, and thus numerous other health problems have to be considered as cause of death. Moreover, previous exposure was well tolerated by the animal. In case of suspected product involvement event would have been reported in close proximity and not long time (almost 3 years) after. The reason for the initial phone call was to discuss the use of the product and not to report the death of the patient. Even though some information is not available (animal details, health status, and necropsy report) sufficient information exists to ruled out product relation completely. Overall, product involvement is considered unlikely.