New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2016-3093
Registrant Reference Number: 1794142
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Address: 8810 Tenth Ave North
City: Minneapolis
Prov / State: MN
Country: USA
Postal Code: 55427-4319
Domestic Animal
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: WEST VIRGINIA
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 1021-1674-8845
Product Name: Hot Shot Bedbug & Flea Fogger
Yes
Unknown
Site: Other / Autre
Préciser le type: Residential apartments, in apartment unit below caller.
Animal's Owner
Dog / Chien
Unknown
1
Male
2
84.00
lbs
Respiratory
<=15 min / <=15 min
Unknown / Inconnu
System
Persisted until death
Yes
No
Unknown
Died
Other / Autre
specify Smelling fumes from product used in apartment below
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
5/19/2016 A report dated 3/30/2016 was forwarded for documentation. The report states that caller's neighbor fogged in the apartment underneath them 5 months ago. An unspecified period of time later, her dog began sneezing and wouldn't eat. Caller took dog to the vet where he was given unknown intravenous medications and recovered. It is not known what the dog's diagnosis was. The neighbor reportedly fogged again on an unspecified date in November 2015, and 4 days later the dog had pus coming out of his eyes and nose, his head became "sunk in," and then he died.
Death
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the insidious development of the complications reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is extremely vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact with this product occurred, such illness would be unexpected and is not consistent with the toxicological profile of this product..