Health Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada
Consumer Product Safety

Incident Report

Subform I: General Information

1. Report Type.

New incident report

Incident Report Number: 2015-4027

2. Registrant Information.

Registrant Reference Number: 2015KP144

Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Bayer Inc

Address: 2920 Matheson Blvd. East

City: Toronto

Prov / State: ON

Country: Canada

Postal Code: L4W 5R6

3. Select the appropriate subform(s) for the incident.

Domestic Animal

4. Date registrant was first informed of the incident.

20-JUL-15

5. Location of incident.

Country: UNITED STATES

Prov / State: UNKNOWN

6. Date incident was first observed.

Unknown

Product Description

7. a) Provide the active ingredient and, if available, the registration number and product name (include all tank mixes). If the product is not registered provide a submission number.

Active(s)

PMRA Registration No.       PMRA Submission No.       EPA Registration No. 11556-142

Product Name: k9 advantix II medium dog

  • Active Ingredient(s)
    • IMIDACLOPRID
      • Guarantee/concentration 8.8 %
    • PERMETHRIN
      • Guarantee/concentration 44 %
    • PYRIPROXYFEN
      • Guarantee/concentration .46 %

7. b) Type of formulation.

Liquid

Application Information

8. Product was applied?

Yes

9. Application Rate.

1

Units: mL

10. Site pesticide was applied to (select all that apply).

Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique

11. Provide any additional information regarding application (how it was applied, amount applied, the size of the area treated etc).

On an unknown date in 2013, a 20 pound, Pug canine, in poor condition, with a history of seizures, was administered 1 tube of K9 Advantix II Medium Dog (Imidacloprid-Permethrin- Pyriproxyfen) topically by the owner.

To be determined by Registrant

12. In your opinion, was the product used according to the label instructions?

Yes

Subform III: Domestic Animal Incident Report

1. Source of Report

Other

2. Type of animal affected

Dog / Chien

3. Breed

Pug

4. Number of animals affected

1

5. Sex

Unknown

6. Age (provide a range if necessary )

20

7. Weight (provide a range if necessary )

Unknown

8. Route(s) of exposure

Skin

9. What was the length of exposure?

>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois

10. Time between exposure and onset of symptoms

<=30 min / <=30 min

11. List all symptoms

System

  • General
    • Symptom - Death
  • Respiratory System
    • Symptom - Laboured breathing
  • Nervous and Muscular Systems
    • Symptom - Seizure
    • Symptom - Convulsions

12. How long did the symptoms last?

Unknown / Inconnu

13. Was medical treatment provided? Provide details in question 17.

No

14. a) Was the animal hospitalized?

No

14. b) How long was the animal hospitalized?

15. Outcome of the incident

Died

16. How was the animal exposed?

Treatment / Traitement

17. Provide any additional details about the incident

(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms

Immediately post application the dog had trouble breathing and had a seizure. It us unknown how long the episode lasted. On an unknown date in 2013, the dog died. It is unknown if a necropsy was performed. No more information is expected. This case is closed.


To be determined by Registrant

18. Severity classification (if there is more than 1 possible classification

Death

19. Provide supplemental information here

Note: Previous application well tolerated. Breathing difficulty is not expected after product application. It is known that, at recommended dosage, none of active ingredients in the product have the potential to provoke seizures in dogs neither alone nor in combination. Only mild neurological signs, e.g. tremors or ataxia, may occur even after licking. Dog tolerated previous applications well, without neurological signs. Dog had a history of seizures. Though consistent time to onset, more likely coincidental occurrence. Death not expected in dog after product application, as inconsistent with pharmaco-toxicological product profile. Reliability questionable due to low level of information (Age unknown, time for reporting is too long (2 years), unknown if necropsy was performed). Though short time to onset of first course, however considering severe signs were preexisting and all unexpecting signs, a product connection is deemed to be unlikely.