New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2014-3468
Registrant Reference Number: SC1421211
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc.
Address: 450-1st Street SW, Suite 2100
City: Calgary
Prov / State: AB
Country: Canada
Postal Code: T2P 5H1
Human
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: TEXAS
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 62719-552
Product Name: Remedy Ultra Herbicide
Liquid
Yes
Unknown
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
No
Other
Sex: Male
Age: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
System
Unknown / Inconnu
Yes
Yes
3
Day(s) / Jour(s)
Occupational
Application
What was the activity? Please refer to field 13 on Subform II or field 17 of subform III for a detailed description regarding the activity
None
Unknown
<=15 min / <=15 min
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
7/11/2014 Caller's husband mixed the product with diesel and applied it with a four-wheeler from a sprayer onto the cacti around him on 07/01/2014. He was wearing shorts, but had tennis shoes and socks on. He does not know of any direct exposure to the product. On 07/03/2014 he noticed that the skin was red around his ankles and feet. This worsened into blisters. On 07/08/2014 he went to the hospital and was admitted, and has been in the hospital since. Husband has second degree burns on his ankle on his left leg and top of his foot. Caller confirms that husband has some burns on his feet where his shoe would have covered while spraying. His skin is peeling, red, swollen, blistered, painful, and has drainage. They think the burn is infected and are treating him for infection with intravenous antibiotics. Caller confirmed that the doctors do not know what caused the burns.
Major
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Direct exposure to this herbicide is not evident in this incident. The delayed onset of the patient symptoms > 48 hours after application is not suggestive of a likely temporal relationship for toxicity, nor would they be expected symptoms at the level of severity reported should contact to airborne spray have occurred. Usually complications such as immediate onset of acute eye, skin and respiratory irritation may be seen following exposure to spray drift. Eye and respiratory symptoms were not reported in this incident, and the dermal symptoms reported were localized to areas where contact with the product would not have occurred even with drift exposure. The differential diagnosis for a skin condition of this nature would include multiple potential etiologies which, in addition to this product, include such factors as plant allergens, poison ivy, poison oak, food, medications, dietary supplements, infectious pathogens, heat exposure, insect bites, etc.