New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2014-0654
Registrant Reference Number: 1-35116213
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Scotts Canada Ltd.
Address: 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 5, Suite 101
City: Mississauga
Prov / State: Ontario
Country: Canada
Postal Code: L5N2R7
Human
Domestic Animal
Country: CANADA
Prov / State: ONTARIO
Unknown
PMRA Registration No. 29695 PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No.
Product Name: Ecosense Weed B Gon RTU Weed Control
Yes
Unknown
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Unknown
Other
Sex: Male
Age: >1 <=6 yrs / > 1 < = 6 ans
System
Unknown / Inconnu
Yes
No
Non-occupational
Contact with treated area
What was the activity? Playing on the lawn
Unknown
Skin
Unknown / Inconnu
<=30 min / <=30 min
1-35116213 - The reporter indicated that both his cat and his grandson were exposed to an herbicide containing the active ingredient iron HEDTA. The reporter applied the product to his lawn one week prior to initial contact with the registrant. One day after the product was applied the reporters (age) year old, 7 pound cat had access to the application site and the reporter indicated that his cat often eats grass and likely ate grass from the application site. About six days after product application the cat was brought to the veterinarian for inappetance, dehydration and lethargy. The veterinarian ran blood work and per the reporter the cat had liver and kidney issues. One week after product application the reporters (age) year old grandson was playing on the lawn and developed hives. The child was taken to the hospital where the hives were treated and at the time of the call the grandsons symptoms had resolved. Prior to this event the child had no known allergies. The reporter was advised that there are numerous possible causes for allergic reactions and symptoms one week after product application would not be expected. Working with a doctor was recommended to help determine an underlying cause for his grandsons allergic reaction. The reporter was further advised that regarding his cats small ingestion of the product it would only be expected to cause transient stomach irritation. With large ingestions it is possible to see more severe symptoms but exposure through ingestion of grass in the application area would only be expected to cause minor stomach irritation. Continued veterinary care was recommended for any ongoing symptoms. On follow-up call, one day later, the reporter indicated that his cat was still very ill and will be taken back to the veterinarian tomorrow. No further information is available.
Minor
Animal's Owner
Cat / Chat
Unknown
1
Male
12
7
lbs
Oral
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
System
Unknown / Inconnu
Yes
Unknown
Unknown/Inconnu
Contact treat.area/Contact surf. traitée
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
1-35116213 - The reporter indicated that both his cat and his grandson were exposed to an herbicide containing the active ingredient iron HEDTA. The reporter applied the product to his lawn one week prior to initial contact with the registrant. One day after the product was applied the reporters (age) year old, 7 pound cat had access to the application site and the reporter indicated that his cat often eats grass and likely ate grass from the application site. About six days after product application the cat was brought to the veterinarian for inappetance, dehydration and lethargy. The veterinarian ran blood work and per the reporter the cat had liver and kidney issues. One week after product application the reporters (age) year old grandson was playing on the lawn and developed hives. The child was taken to the hospital where the hives were treated and at the time of the call the grandsons symptoms had resolved. Prior to this event the child had no known allergies. The reporter was advised that there are numerous possible causes for allergic reactions and symptoms one week after product application would not be expected. Working with a doctor was recommended to help determine an underlying cause for his grandsons allergic reaction. The reporter was further advised that regarding his cats small ingestion of the product it would only be expected to cause transient stomach irritation. With large ingestions it is possible to see more severe symptoms but exposure through ingestion of grass in the application area would only be expected to cause minor stomach irritation. Continued veterinary care was recommended for any ongoing symptoms. On follow-up call, one day later, the reporter indicated that his cat was still very ill and will be taken back to the veterinarian tomorrow. No further information is available.
Moderate