New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2013-3571
Registrant Reference Number: PROSAR Case#: 1-34024031
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Syngenta Canada Inc.
Address: 140 Research Lane, Research Park
City: Guelph
Prov / State: Ontario
Country: Canada
Postal Code: N1G4Z3
Human
Country: CANADA
Prov / State: SASKATCHEWAN
PMRA Registration No. 30436 PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No.
Product Name: Cruiser Maxx Vibrance Cereals
Yes
Site: Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown
Data Subject
Sex: Male
Age: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
System
>3 days <=1 wk / >3 jours <=1 sem
Yes
Unknown
Occupational
Application
Unknown
Skin
Unknown / Inconnu
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
1-34024031- The reporter indicated her spouse was exposed to a treated seed. The product was indicated as Cruiser Maxx Vibrance treated barley. The seed treatment is comprised of the active ingredients thiamethoxam, difenoconazole, metalaxyl-M (and S-isomer), and sedaxane. The reporter stated her husband had been working with the seed 06/11/13 through 06/13/13. She did not clarify in what capacity he was working with the product or for what duration on those days he had been working with the product. The caller reports her spouse was wearing a mask and leather gloves. No other personal protective equipment was described. The night of 06/11/13 he developed fluid buildup or a pocket under his eyes and his eyes were irritated. The caller stated he had been using a topical over the counter diphenhydramine product on the area and oral diphenhydramine but he had not received relief. She indicated her husband has allergies. The caller was advised of the potential irritant effect of the grain dust but the symptoms described would not be anticipated to be related to the seed treatment or consistent with any of the active ingredients. The same day of the initial report a nurse practitioner called to report he had seen the patient. The caller described water retention and a rash under the eyes of the patient. The caller commented the area affected did seem to correspond to the area on the callers face not covered by his mask or respirator. The caller did not describe treatment proposed but the caller did comment the patients symptoms may also be related to the barley seed dust. The patients spouse was contacted again three days after the initial report. She indicated her husband had resolved. His symptoms had persisted for five days. No further information is available.
Moderate