New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2013-1594
Registrant Reference Number: 1069920
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Bell Laboratories, Inc.
Address: 3699 Kinsman Blvd
City: Madison
Prov / State: WI
Country: USA
Postal Code: 53704
Domestic Animal
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: NEW YORK
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 12455-69-3240
Product Name: Tomcat Ultra (Bait Tray) (discontinued)
Bait
Unknown
Unknown
Animal's Owner
Dog / Chien
Corgi (Welsh, Pembroke or Cardigan)
1
Female
8
25.00
lbs
Oral
>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois
>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois
System
Persisted until death
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Died
Accidental ingestion/Ingestion accident.
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
11/6/2012 10:14:21 PM The callers dog ingested 4 oz of bait on Nov 6, 2012. Following ingestion, vomiting was induced within 60 min and some bait was recovered. The dog remained asymptomatic and the pet owner denied the possibility of previous rodenticide exposure. 11/19/2012 10:55:20 AM The pet owner called back with an update to his case. On Nov 16, 2012 the caller realized that his dog had gained access to and ingested an additional 8 ounces of bait between Nov 11 and Nov 14, 2013. The dog also runs free on their horse farm and has the opportunity to ingest any number of things, including anticoagulant rodenticides. The dog became ill (unspecified clinical signs) on Nov 14, 2012 and subsequently died in the veterinary clinic on Nov 15, 2012. Anticoagulant rodenticide poisoning was suspected but not confirmed and it is unclear as to whether or not any treatment was provided. There is a second dog in the home who has undergone coagulation testing and the results were normal
Death
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews.