Incident Report
Subform I: General Information
1. Report Type.
New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2012-3393
2. Registrant Information.
Registrant Reference Number: SC1008864
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc.
Address: Suite 2100, 450 - 1 Street S.W.
City: Calgary
Prov / State: Alberta
Country: Canada
Postal Code: T2P 5H1
3. Select the appropriate subform(s) for the incident.
Human
Domestic Animal
4. Date registrant was first informed of the incident.
17-JUL-12
5. Location of incident.
Country: CANADA
Prov / State: SASKATCHEWAN
6. Date incident was first observed.
14-JUL-12
Product Description
7. a) Provide the active ingredient and, if available, the registration number and product name (include all tank mixes). If the product is not registered provide a submission number.
Active(s)
PMRA Registration No. 14879
PMRA Submission No.
EPA Registration No.
Product Name: Lorsban 4E Insecticide
7. b) Type of formulation.
Application Information
8. Product was applied?
Yes
9. Application Rate.
Unknown
10. Site pesticide was applied to (select all that apply).
Site: Agricultural-Outdoor/Agricole-extérieur
Préciser le type: unknown
11. Provide any additional information regarding application (how it was applied, amount applied, the size of the area treated etc).
The caller states that his neighbors were spraying the product on crops using an airplane on July 14, 2012. His cattle were up against the fence on the side of his property adjacent to the farm field that was being sprayed. The caller reports that he thinks there was a significant drift of the spray as it was a hot, windy day. He did not actually witness the airborne spray landing on the cattle as he was inside his home at the time. A 2-day old calf became ill on the evening of July 14, 2012 and the owner treated with Nuflor, electrolytes and CalfSpan bolus for diarrhea. The calf was having diarrhea and a slight change in breathing on July 14. The electrolytes were administered with a bottle and the calf seem to vomit or regurgitate part of it. By the next morning the calf had expired. A veterinarian was not contacted and the farmer is not pursuing an autopsy.
To be determined by Registrant
12. In your opinion, was the product used according to the label instructions?
Unknown
Subform II: Human Incident Report (A separate form for each person affected)
1. Source of Report.
Medical Professional
2. Demographic information of data subject
Sex: Male
Age: Unknown / Inconnu
3. List all symptoms, using the selections below.
System
- Nervous and Muscular Systems
- Symptom - Headache
- Symptom - Muscle pain
4. How long did the symptoms last?
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
5. Was medical treatment provided? Provide details in question 13.
No
6. a) Was the person hospitalized?
No
6. b) For how long?
7. Exposure scenario
Non-occupational
8. How did exposure occur? (Select all that apply)
Drift from the application site
9. If the exposure occured during application or re-entry, what protective clothing was worn? (select all that apply)
None
10. Route(s) of exposure.
Respiratory
11. What was the length of exposure?
Unknown / Inconnu
12. Time between exposure and onset of symptoms.
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
13. Provide any additional details about the incident (eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms, type of medical treatment, results from medical tests, outcome of the incident, amount of pesticide exposed to, etc.)
An adjacent neighbor was spraying by airplane their crops with Lorsban 4E. The farmer felt symptoms of headache, body aches and diarrhea 24 hrs post application of the product. The farmer was not outside during the spraying and did not describe any defined point of contact with the liquid insecticide. He also admits that he may have a "bug" of some sort, but just not sure. A medical professional explained to the farmer that although some symptoms he has reported are consistent with organophosphate toxicity, but these would not be expected if the product is diluted and used per product directions. Also explained that his flu-like symptoms appearing greater than 24 hrs after product exposure are not consistent with product exposure.
To be determined by Registrant
14. Severity classification.
Minor
15. Provide supplemental information here.
Subform III: Domestic Animal Incident Report
1. Source of Report
Medical Professional
2. Type of animal affected
Cow / Vache
3. Breed
Boivine
4. Number of animals affected
1
5. Sex
Unknown
6. Age (provide a range if necessary )
0
7. Weight (provide a range if necessary )
Unknown
8. Route(s) of exposure
Skin
Respiratory
9. What was the length of exposure?
Unknown / Inconnu
10. Time between exposure and onset of symptoms
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
11. List all symptoms
System
- Respiratory System
- Symptom - Other
- Specify - slight change in breathing
12. How long did the symptoms last?
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
13. Was medical treatment provided? Provide details in question 17.
No
14. a) Was the animal hospitalized?
No
14. b) How long was the animal hospitalized?
15. Outcome of the incident
Died
16. How was the animal exposed?
Spray drift / Dérive de pulvérisation
17. Provide any additional details about the incident
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
A 2-day old calf became ill on the evening of July 14, 2012 and the owner treated with Nuflor, electrolytes and CalfSpan bolus for diarrhea. The calf was having diarrhea and a slight change in breathing. The electrolytes were administered with a bottle and the calf seem to vomit or regurgitate part of it. By the next morning the calf had expired. A veterinarian was not contacted and the farmer is not pursuing an autopsy. The 2-day old calf did not have a postmortem exam. Calf symptoms were diarrhea, and dyspnea just prior to time of death and expired despite supportive measures. No other livestock have fallen ill. A medical professional explained that a 2-day old calf can have multiple complications based on symptoms reported, and that a postmortem exam would have been useful to him. Correct use of product would not likely result in complications to the calf or to him.
To be determined by Registrant
18. Severity classification (if there is more than 1 possible classification
Death
19. Provide supplemental information here