New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2012-0827
Registrant Reference Number: 926134
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Bayer CropScience Inc.
Address: 295 Henderson Drive
City: Regina
Prov / State: SK
Country: Canada
Postal Code: S4N 6C2
Human
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: VIRGINIA
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 432-7483
Product Name: Temprid SC Insecticide
Liquid
Yes
Unknown
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Other
Sex: Female
Age: >64 yrs / > 64 ans
System
Persisted until death
Unknown
Unknown
Non-occupational
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
02/07/2012 Caller is a pest control professional, who was contacted by a female client on 2/2/12 to complain that since her house (interior) was treated with product on 1/18/12, there had been staining on the premises, and she had been feeling nauseated and light-headed. She seemed more concerned with the staining on the floor. Caller spoke to the female client's husband (name) today, and husband informed him that she had died - "over the weekend". Caller wishes to report this incident. Case to tox. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 02/07/12 Spoke with initial caller - reports that treatment with Temprid was done on or about 18JAN2012 by PCO. According to paperwork this was a "crack and crevasse" treatment in the kitchen. bathroom, living room bedroom and the pipe chases throughout the structure. His firm was initially contacted on or about 2FEB2012 by (name) (primarily) to report problems with "staining" around the home. She had may off hand comments at that time about complaints of dizziness and nausea. Staff had requested they schedule a follow up with her to come and assess the premises and to consider clean up of any stained areas. She had agreed but had specifically noted that she had not wanted husband to be made aware of her call to them (the PCO). Printed 2/7/2012 1:04 PM Page: 1 of 2 His firm was initially contacted on or about 2FEB2012 by (name) (primarily) to report problems with "staining" around the home. She had may off hand comments at that time about complaints of dizziness and nausea. Staff had requested they schedule a follow up with her to come and assess the premises and to consider clean up of any stained areas. She had agreed but had specifically noted that she had not wanted husband to be made aware of her call to them (the PCO). (name) called this morning to set up the appointment and was informed by husband that she had died over this past weekend. No further details are known. According to his staff that had done the treatment at her home, she was an "elderly" woman though nothing else is known.
Death
According to the information received, the application was a crack and crevice treatment. This type of application minimizes the potential for any exposure to the product. Therefore, in our opinion, the cause of death is independent of any exposure to this product, and the apparent temporal association is purely coincidental. Not only was there no allegation from the deceased s family that the product was involved, but the notice of death was only obtained by a follow-up contact by the PCO to the deceased s family to address unrelated issues.